ArticleBritish journal of cancer2011
Poly(A) RT-PCR measurement of diagnostic genes in pancreatic juice in pancreatic cancer.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- PSCA rs2294008 Polymorphism with Increased Risk of Cancer.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- From bench to bedside: pancreatic juice as a platform for biomarker discovery in pancreatic disease.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026Review
- Single-Nuclei Characterization of Lacrimal Gland in Scopolamine-Induced Dry Eye Disease.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Annexin-A1: The culprit or the solution?Immunology · 2022Review
- Consensus reference gene(s) for gene expression studies in human cancers: end of the tunnel visible?Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2015Review
- Circulating microRNAs in Pancreatic Juice as Candidate Biomarkers of Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of Cancer · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe last decade has seen significant progress in understanding the molecular biology of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. There is now an urgent need to translate these molecular techniques to clinical practice in order to improve diagnosis and prediction of response to treatment. The objectives of this study are to utilise poly(A) RT-PCR to measure expression levels of diagnostic Indicator genes, selected from microarray studies, of RNA from intraoperatively sampled pancreatic ductal juice and to correlate these expression levels with those in matched pancreatic tissue resection samples.
methodsIntraoperative sampling of pancreatic juice and collection of matched tissue samples was undertaken in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for suspected tumour. RNA was isolated and poly(A) PCR and real-time PCR used to measure expression levels of 30 genes. Spearman's rank correlation test was used to examine the relationship of gene expression between pancreatic juice and tissue.
resultsOf the 30 Indicator genes measured, just one, ANXA1, showed a significant correlation of expression level between pancreatic juice and tissue samples, whereas three genes, IGFBP3 (P0.035), PSCA (P0.001) and SPINK1 (P0.05), showed significantly different expression between cancerous and benign pancreatic tissue samples.
conclusionsThese results demonstrate that RNA analysis of pancreatic juice is feasible using the poly(A) cDNA technique, that correlation of gene expression exists between pancreatic juice and tissue for very few genes and that gene expression profiling can distinguish between benign and malignant pancreatic tissue. This indicates possible use of the technique for measurement of Indicator genes in pancreatic tissue for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer from very small tissue samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.