Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21245838›Full record

ArticleNature communications2011

Asymmetric spermatocyte division as a mechanism for controlling sex ratios.

Diane C Shakes, Bryan J Neva, Henry Huynh, Jyotiska Chaudhuri, Andre Pires-Dasilva

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Widespread sex ratio polymorphism inRoyal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of nematology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Diane C ShakesDepartment of Biology, College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 8795, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187, USA.
Bryan J Neva
Henry Huynh
Jyotiska Chaudhuri
Andre Pires-Dasilva
The University of Texas at Arlington · USWilliam & Mary · USWilliams (United States) · US

Funding

METAPHASE TO ANAPHASE TRANSITION IN MITOSIS AND MEIOSISR15GM060359 · NIGMS · COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY · PI SHAKES, DIANE C · 2000 to 2003
$245k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM060359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although Mendel's first law predicts that crosses between XY (or XO) males and XX females should yield equal numbers of males and females, individuals in a wide variety of metazoans transmit their sex chromosomes unequally and produce broods with highly skewed sex ratios. Here, we report two modifications to the cellular programme of spermatogenesis, which, in combination, help to explain why males of the free-living nematode species Rhabditis sp. SB347 sire <5% male progeny. First, the spermatogenesis programme involves a modified meiosis in which chromatids of the unpaired X chromosome separate prematurely, in meiosis I. Second, during anaphase II, cellular components essential for sperm motility are partitioned almost exclusively to the X-bearing sperm. Our studies reveal a novel cellular mechanism for the differential transmission of X-bearing sperm and suggest Rhabditis sp. SB347 as a useful model for studying sex chromosome drive and the evolution of new mating systems.

Identifiers

PMID21245838
PMCPMC5885250
OpenAlexW2139113874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.