Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21245461›Full record

Trial reportCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2011

Randomized trial of targeted performance feedback to facilitate quality improvement in acute myocardial infarction care.

Karen P Alexander, Tracy Y Wang, Shuang Li, Barbara L Lytle, Lara E Slattery, Sarah Calhoun, Jennifer Poteat, Matthew T Roe, John S Rumsfeld, Christopher P Cannon and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Patient-mediated interventions to improve professional practice.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karen P AlexanderDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 27710, USA. karen.alexander@duke.edu
Tracy Y Wang
Shuang Li
Barbara L Lytle
Lara E Slattery
Sarah Calhoun
Jennifer Poteat
Matthew T Roe
John S Rumsfeld
Christopher P Cannon
Eric D Peterson

Funding

Centers for Cardiovascular Outcomes ResearchU01HL107023 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI PETERSON, ERIC DAVID · 2010 to 2013
$2.6M
Developing Effectiveness Research Methodologies and MeasuresU18HS010548 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KRAMER, JUDITH M · 1999 to 2006
$790k
AHRQ HHS U18 HS010548NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL107023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEfforts to improve quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are a national priority. To date, there have been few studies that have prospectively evaluated hospital quality improvement (QI) interventions. METHODS AND

resultsUsing hospitals in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) ACTION Registry-GWTG, a cluster randomized trial of the effectiveness of targeted performance feedback to facilitate process improvement for AMI care will be conducted. ACTION Registry-GWTG hospitals with a minimum of 50 AMI patients per 2 quarters are eligible for randomization. The control arm receives standard performance feedback reports, and the intervention arm receives standard performance feedback reports in addition to a supplemental report on the "top 3" centrally identified, hospital-specific performance gaps. The primary outcome will be improvement in a composite of all metrics, and the secondary outcome will be improvement in the targeted metrics. At study inception in January 2009, 149 sites were randomized: 76 to the intervention arm, and 73 to the control arm. Intervention and control sites were well balanced in terms of baseline performance, center characteristics, and AMI volume (≈70 patients per quarter). The intervention phase will continue for 5 feedback cycles, each containing 2 quarters of data feedback over 18 months. A final trial outcome report will follow.

conclusionsThis randomized trial will evaluate a novel hospital-level QI intervention of targeted performance feedback for AMI, thereby demonstrating the effective use of national registries for QI and furthering our understanding of effective QI methods.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareAcute DiseaseFeedbackHumansMyocardial InfarctionOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID21245461
PMCPMC3061815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.