Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21245105›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2011

Evaluation of large scale quantitative proteomic assay development using peptide affinity-based mass spectrometry.

Jeffrey R Whiteaker, Lei Zhao, Susan E Abbatiello, Michael Burgess, Eric Kuhn, ChenWei Lin, Matthew E Pope, Morteza Razavi, N Leigh Anderson, Terry W Pearson and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The Breast Cancer Proteome and Precision Oncology.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An Introduction to Advanced Targeted Acquisition Methods.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Clinical potential of mass spectrometry-based proteogenomics.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jeffrey R WhiteakerFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Lei Zhao
Susan E Abbatiello
Michael Burgess
Eric Kuhn
ChenWei Lin
Matthew E Pope
Morteza Razavi
N Leigh Anderson
Terry W Pearson
Steven A Carr
Amanda G Paulovich
Broad Institute · USUniversity of Victoria · CACape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa · ZAFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Measuring Cancer Biomarker Candidates by Targeted MS and Ab EnrichmentU24CA126476 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI CARR, STEVEN A · 2006 to 2010
$14.6M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA126476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stable isotope standards and capture by antipeptide antibodies (SISCAPA) couples affinity enrichment of peptides with stable isotope dilution and detection by multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry to provide quantitative measurement of peptides as surrogates for their respective proteins. In this report, we describe a feasibility study to determine the success rate for production of suitable antibodies for SISCAPA assays in order to inform strategies for large-scale assay development. A workflow was designed that included a multiplex immunization strategy in which up to five proteotypic peptides from a single protein target were used to immunize individual rabbits. A total of 403 proteotypic tryptic peptides representing 89 protein targets were used as immunogens. Antipeptide antibody titers were measured by ELISA and 220 antipeptide antibodies representing 89 proteins were chosen for affinity purification. These antibodies were characterized with respect to their performance in SISCAPA-multiple reaction monitoring assays using trypsin-digested human plasma matrix. More than half of the assays generated were capable of detecting the target peptide at concentrations of less than 0.5 fmol/μl in human plasma, corresponding to protein concentrations of less than 100 ng/ml. The strategy of multiplexing five peptide immunogens was successful in generating a working assay for 100% of the targeted proteins in this evaluation study. These results indicate it is feasible for a single laboratory to develop hundreds of assays per year and allow planning for cost-effective generation of SISCAPA assays.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBlood ProteinsCarrier ProteinsHumansImmune SeraImmunoassayMass SpectrometryMicrofilament ProteinsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPeptidesProteomeRabbitsSensitivity and SpecificityBlood ProteinsCarrier ProteinsFSCN1 protein, humanImmune SeraMicrofilament ProteinsPeptidesProteome

Identifiers

PMID21245105
PMCPMC3069346
OpenAlexW2009455674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.