Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21244690›Full record

ArticleJournal of immune based therapies and vaccines2011

Phase IIb randomized trial of adjunct immunotherapy in patients with first-diagnosed tuberculosis, relapsed and multi-drug-resistant (MDR) TB.

Dmitry A Butov, Yuri N Pashkov, Anna L Stepanenko, Aleksandra I Choporova, Tanya S Butova, Dendev Batdelger, Vichai Jirathitikal, Aldar S Bourinbaiar, Svetlana I Zaitzeva

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of immune based therapies and vaccines, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01380119 (Phase 2 Study of Orally Formulated Heat-killed Mycobacterium Vaccae Study in TB Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01380119 phase2completednot on this map

Phase 2 Study of Orally Formulated Heat-killed Mycobacterium Vaccae Study in TB Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorLisichansk Regional Tuberculosis DispensaryRan2011 to 2012Enrolled40ConditionsTuberculosisArmsV7, placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Towards new TB vaccines.Seminars in immunopathology · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
  5. TB vaccine development and the End TB Strategy: importance and current status.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2016
    Review
  6. Immunotherapy for tuberculosis: future prospects.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2016
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dmitry A ButovDepartment of Phtysiatry and Pulmonology, Kharkov National Medical University; Kharkov, Ukraine. zaitzeva@list.ru.
Yuri N Pashkov
Anna L Stepanenko
Aleksandra I Choporova
Tanya S Butova
Dendev Batdelger
Vichai Jirathitikal
Aldar S Bourinbaiar
Svetlana I Zaitzeva

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Placebo-controlled, randomized, phase 2b trial was conducted in 34 adults comprising 18 first-diagnosed (52.9%), 6 relapsed (17.6%), and 10 MDR-TB (29.4%) cases to investigate the safety and efficacy of an oral immune adjunct (V5). The immunotherapy (N = 24) and placebo (N = 10) arms received once-daily tablet of V5 or placebo for one month in addition to conventional anti-TB therapy (ATT) administered under directly observed therapy (DOT).The enlarged liver, total bilirubin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, lymphocyte and leukocyte counts improved significantly in V5 recipients (P = 0.002; 0.03; 8.3E-007; 2.8E-005; and 0.002) but remained statistically unchanged in the placebo group (P = 0.68; 0.96; 0.61; 0.91; and 0.43 respectively). The changes in hemoglobin and ALT levels in both treatment arms were not significant. The body weight increased in all V5-treated patients by an average 3.5 ± 1.8 kg (P = 2.3E-009), while 6 out of 10 patients on placebo gained mean 0.9 ± 0.9 kg (P = 0.01). Mycobacterial clearance in sputum smears was observed in 78.3% and 0% of patients on V5 and placebo (P = 0.009). The conversion rate in V5-receiving subjects with MDR-TB (87.5%) seemed to be higher than in first-diagnosed TB (61.5%) but the difference was not significant (P = 0.62). Scoring of sputum bacillary load (range 3-0) at baseline and post-treatment revealed score reduction in 23 out of 24 (95.8%) V5 recipients (from mean/median 2.2/3 to 0.3/0; P = 6E-010) but only in 1 out of 10 (10%) patients on placebo (1.9/1.5 vs. 1.8/1; P = 0.34). No adverse effects or TB reactivation were seen at any time during follow-up. V5 is safe as an immune adjunct to chemotherapeutic management of TB and can shorten substantially the duration of treatment.

Identifiers

PMID21244690
PMCPMC3031205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.