Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21243452›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2011

Early management of severe acute pancreatitis.

Rupjyoti Talukdar, Santhi Swaroop Vege

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Advances in Management of Acute Pancreatitis.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2016
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Predictors of adverse outcomes in acute pancreatitis: new horizons.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2013
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rupjyoti TalukdarMiles and Shirley Fiterman Center for Digestive Diseases, 200 First Street SW, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. rup_talukdar@yahoo.com
Santhi Swaroop Vege

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant literature on the management of acute severe acute pancreatitis has emerged in recent years. The new information ranges from data on newer single or multiparameter severity assessment tools and classification systems to therapeutic modalities. However, a few basic issues-the ideal severity assessment modality, volume of intravenous fluids required in the first 48 to 72 h, and the role of prophylactic antibiotics-are still not clear and are subject to controversy. The International Working Group has devised the Revised Atlanta Classification, which will be published soon. This new classification is eagerly awaited worldwide, and hopefully clarifies many of the problems of the original Atlanta Classification. In this article, we discuss the developments that have arisen in the past 2 to 3 years concerning the classification, prognostication, and early management of severe acute pancreatitis.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAntibiotic ProphylaxisCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeEnteral NutritionFluid TherapyHumansPancreatitisPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingParenteral NutritionPrognosisSeverity of Illness IndexSphincterotomy, Endoscopic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.