ReviewBehavior genetics2011
In search of the perfect phenotype: an analysis of linkage and association studies of reading and reading-related processes.
Review in Behavior genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- White matter deficits correlate with visual motion perception impairments in dyslexic carriers of the DCDC2 genetic risk variant.Experimental brain research · 2021Article
- Differential activation of the visual word form area during auditory phoneme perception in youth with dyslexia.Neuropsychologia · 2020Article
- Reintroducing Dyslexia: Early Identification and Implications for Pediatric Practice.Pediatrics · 2020Review
- The BDNF Val66Met Polymorphism Influences Reading Ability and Patterns of Neural Activation in Children.PloS one · 2016Article
- Polymorphisms in DCDC2 and S100B associate with developmental dyslexia.Journal of human genetics · 2015Article
- Genetic analysis of dyslexia candidate genes in the European cross-linguistic NeuroDys cohort.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2014Article
- Embryonic disruption of the candidate dyslexia susceptibility gene homolog Kiaa0319-like results in neuronal migration disorders.Neuroscience · 2013Article
- A genome-wide association study for reading and language abilities in two population cohorts.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2013Article
- Mathematics is differentially related to reading comprehension and word decoding: Evidence from a genetically-sensitive design.Journal of educational psychology · 2012Article
- Tackling the 'dyslexia paradox': reading brain and behavior for early markers of developmental dyslexia.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive scienceReview
- The Role of Neural and Genetic Processes in Learning to Read and Specific Reading Disabilities: Implications for Instruction.Reading research quarterlyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reading ability and specific reading disability (SRD) are complex traits involving several cognitive processes and are shaped by a complex interplay of genetic and environmental forces. Linkage studies of these traits have identified several susceptibility loci. Association studies have gone further in detecting candidate genes that might underlie these signals. These results have been obtained in samples of mainly European ancestry, which vary in their languages, inclusion criteria, and phenotype assessments. Such phenotypic heterogeneity across samples makes understanding the relationship between reading (dis)ability and reading-related processes and the genetic factors difficult; in addition, it may negatively influence attempts at replication. In moving forward, the identification of preferable phenotypes for future sample collection may improve the replicability of findings. This review of all published linkage and association results from the past 15 years was conducted to determine if certain phenotypes produce more replicable and consistent results than others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.