Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21240149›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology bulletin2010

Lamotrigine adjunctive therapy to lithium and divalproex in depressed patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder and a recent substance use disorder: a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study.

Zuowei Wang, Keming Gao, David E Kemp, Philip K Chan, Mary Beth Serrano, Carla Conroy, Yiru Fang, Stephen J Ganocy, Robert L Findling, Joseph R Calabrese

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology bulletin, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zuowei WangDepartment of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Keming Gao
David E Kemp
Philip K Chan
Mary Beth Serrano
Carla Conroy
Yiru Fang
Stephen J Ganocy
Robert L Findling
Joseph R Calabrese
Case Western Reserve University · USShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNUniversity School · US

Funding

Psychosocial Intervention to Promote Treatment Adherence in CMCHP20MH066054 · NIMH · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CALABRESE, JOSEPH R · 2003 to 2007
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS P20 MH066054NIMH NIH HHS P20 MH-66054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo pilot the efficacy and safety data of lamotrigine adjunctive therapy to lithium and divalproex in patients with rapid-cycling bipolar disorder (RCBD) and a recent substance use disorder (SUD).

methodStructured clinical interviews were used to ascertain DSM-IV diagnosis of RCBD, SUDs, and other Axis I disorders. Patients who did not meet the criteria for a bimodal response after up to 16-weeks of open-label treatment with lithium plus divalproex, as measured by MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale) ≤ 19, YMRS ( Young Mania Rating Scale) ≤ 12 and GAF (Global Assessment of Functioning) = 51 for 4 weeks, were randomized to a 12- week, double-blind addition of lamotrigine or placebo to lithium plus divalproex. Primary and secondary outcomes were analyzed with ANCOVA, t-test, or chi-square/Fisher's exact.

resultsOf 98 patients enrolled into the study, 36 were randomized to receive lamotrigine (n = 18) or placebo (n ± 18), and 8 patients per arm completed the study. No patient discontinued due to adverse events. The change in MADRS total score from baseline to endpoint was -9.1 ± 11.2 in lamotrigine-treated patients versus -4.5 ± 13.1 in placebo-treated patients (p = 0.27). There were no significant differences in changes in YMRS total scores and rates of response or remission.

conclusionsLamotrigine adjunctive therapy was well tolerated in patients previously non-responsive to initial treatment of lithium plus divalproex. A larger study is warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of adjunctive lamotrigine versus placebo in RCBD with a recent SUD.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceAntimanic AgentsBipolar DisorderChi-Square DistributionDepressionDouble-Blind MethodDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansLamotrigineLithium CompoundsMiddle AgedOhioPilot ProjectsPlacebosPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesAntimanic AgentsLamotrigineLithium CompoundsPlacebosTriazinesValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID21240149
PMCPMC3442254
OpenAlexW1490350884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.