Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21239829›Full record

ReviewHematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program2010

Sickle-cell trait: novel clinical significance.

Nigel S Key, Vimal K Derebail

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bendamustine-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus - A case report.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nigel S KeyDivision of Hematology/Oncology, UNC Kidney Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. Nigel_key@med.unc.edu
Vimal K Derebail
Palmetto Hematology Oncology · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Duke-UNC Clinical Hematology Research Career Development ProgramK12HL087097 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI TELEN, MARILYN J · 2006 to 2016
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL087097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a long-standing controversy in the literature as to whether sickle-cell trait (SCT) should be viewed as a benign carrier state or as an intermediate disease phenotype. Because SCT is routinely detected by neonatal screening for sickle-cell disease, it becomes imperative that consensus on this issue be achieved in order to provide the best medical advice to affected individuals. The issue of selective screening in the post-neonatal period was thrust into the limelight recently by the National Collegiate Athletic Association's recommendation that its member colleges and universities test student-athletes to confirm their carrier status if not already known. The stated goal of this recommendation was to prevent exercise-related sudden death in athletes with SCT. We review some of the reported complications of SCT for which new information has emerged, focusing particularly on venous thromboembolism and renal manifestations.

Indexed as

ExerciseHumansKidney DiseasesSickle Cell TraitVenous Thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID21239829
PMCPMC3299004
OpenAlexW2133899116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.