Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21239549›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2011

Diversity of multidrug-resistant salmonella enterica strains associated with cattle at harvest in the United States.

Dayna M Brichta-Harhay, Terrance M Arthur, Joseph M Bosilevac, Norasak Kalchayanand, Steven D Shackelford, Tommy L Wheeler, Mohammad Koohmaraie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A novel approach for detectingFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review:Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Population Dynamics ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Phenotypic and Genotypic Eligible Methods forFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
  17. Occurrence ofGut pathogens · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dayna M Brichta-HarhayU.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933-0166, USA. dayna.harhay@ars.usda.gov
Terrance M Arthur
Joseph M Bosilevac
Norasak Kalchayanand
Steven D Shackelford
Tommy L Wheeler
Mohammad Koohmaraie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence and diversity of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Salmonella enterica strains associated with cattle at harvest in the United States were examined. Hides and carcasses of cattle were sampled at processing plants (n = 6) located in four geographically distant regions from July 2005 to April 2006. The mean prevalences of Salmonella on hides, preevisceration carcasses (immediately after hide removal), and postintervention carcasses (in the chiller and after the full complement of interventions) were 89.6%, 50.2%, and 0.8%, respectively. The values for MDR Salmonella enterica strains (defined as those resistant to two or more antimicrobials) as percentages of Salmonella prevalence were 16.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.3 to 25.1%; median percent prevalence, 6.9%), 11.7% (95% CI, 4.4 to 19.0%; median, 4.8%), and 0.33% (95% CI, -0.3 to 0.70%; median, 0%), respectively. In this study, 16,218 Salmonella hide and carcass isolates were screened for antimicrobial resistance. Of these, 978 (6.0%) unique MDR S. enterica isolates were identified and serotyped and their XbaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles determined. The predominant MDR S. enterica serotypes observed were Newport (53.1%), Typhimurium (16.6%), and Uganda (10.9%). Differences in MDR S. enterica prevalence were detected, and PFGE analysis revealed both epidemic clusters (profiles found in plants in multiple regions/seasons) and endemic clusters (profiles observed in plants in limited regions/seasons) within several of the MDR serotypes examined. Despite these differences, multiple-hurdle processing interventions employed at all plants were found to be quite effective and decreased Salmonella carcass contamination by 98.4% (95% CI, 97.6 to 99.7%).

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGenetic VariationAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Typing TechniquesCattleCluster AnalysisElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenotypeMolecular TypingSalmonella entericaSalmonella Infections, AnimalSerotypingUnited StatesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID21239549
PMCPMC3067267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.