Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21239171›Full record

ArticleTrends in microbiology2011

When microbial conversations get physical.

Gemma Reguera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Towards the Idea of Molecular Brains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Cell-to-cell signaling through light: just a ghost of chance?Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2013
    Article
  20. Non-chemical and non-contact cell-to-cell communication: a short review.American journal of translational research · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Gemma RegueraDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, 6190 Biomedical & Physical Science Building, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. reguera@msu.edu

Funding

Novel Mechanism of Uranium Reduction Via Microbial NanowiresR01ES017052 · NIEHS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI REGUERA, GEMMA · 2009 to 2011
$887k
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES017052NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES017052-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely accepted that microorganisms are social beings. Whereas communication via chemical signals (e.g. quorum sensing) has been the focus of most investigations, the use of physical signals for microbial cell-cell communication has received only limited attention. In this Opinion article, I postulate that physical modes of microbial communication could be widespread in nature. This is based on experimental evidence on the microbial emission and response to three physical signals: sound waves, electromagnetic radiation and electric currents. These signals propagate rapidly, and even at very low intensities, they provide useful mechanisms when a rapid response is required. I also make some suggestions for promising future research avenues that could provide novel and unsuspected insights into the physical nature of microbial signaling networks.

Indexed as

Electric ConductivityElectromagnetic RadiationSoundCell CommunicationElectronsFimbriae, BacterialMechanotransduction, CellularMicrobiological PhenomenaModels, BiologicalPhotons

Identifiers

PMID21239171
PMCPMC3057284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.