Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21235854›Full record

Trial reportBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2011

Neonatal red blood cell transfusions: searching for better guidelines.

Kavita Kasat, Karen D Hendricks-Muñoz, Pradeep V Mally

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Red Cell Transfusion Practices in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: An Experience from Tertiary Care Centre.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Recommendations for transfusion therapy in neonatology.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kavita KasatDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York, 269-01 76th Avenue, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA. kkasat@nshs.edu
Karen D Hendricks-Muñoz
Pradeep V Mally
Cohen Children's Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPacked red blood cell (RBC) transfusions are often administered to patients in the neonatal intensive care unit. The purpose of this study was to determine whether current blood transfusion guidelines are as useful as care givers' perception in identifying patients in need of a packed RBC transfusion. DESIGN AND

methodsHealth care providers were asked to complete a pre- and post-transfusion survey on neonates receiving a packed RBC transfusion. These patients were divided into three groups based on reasons for transfusion: (i) guidelines; (ii) care-givers' perceptions of need for packed RBC transfusion; or (iii) both. These three groups were further subdivided into two cohorts according to whether they had a clinical improvement or not. Demographic data and clinical variables were compared between the groups.

resultsSeventy-eight care-givers were surveyed. Eighteen patients (23%) were transfused based on guidelines, 36 (46%) based on care givers' perception and 24 (31%) based on both. Neonates transfused based on guidelines alone were more likely to have received the transfusion in the first week of life, had a higher pre-transfusion haematocrit, were less symptomatic and had a higher trend to require mechanical ventilation. Neonates transfused based on caregivers' perception were more likely to be on non-invasive ventilatory support and were more symptomatic. Neonates who improved after a transfusion had a lower pre-transfusion haematocrit (p=0.02), were more symptomatic (p=0.01) and were more likely to be on non-invasive ventilatory support (p=0.002) when compared to the group without a clinical improvement. The group without improvement had an increase in oxygen requirement (+2.8±6.4) after the transfusion (p=0.0004). Tachycardia was the most sensitive predictor of a benefit from packed RBC transfusion [OR 6.48: p=0.005]. DISCUSSION: Guidelines on when to transfuse stable growing neonates with packed RBC should be re-evaluated to include more care giver judgement and perhaps be more restrictive for critically ill neonates.

Indexed as

CaregiversErythrocyte TransfusionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePractice Guidelines as TopicRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesTachycardia

Identifiers

PMID21235854
PMCPMC3021402
OpenAlexW1561334862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.