Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21235822›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2011

NeOProM: Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration study protocol.

Lisa M Askie, Peter Brocklehurst, Brian A Darlow, Neil Finer, Barbara Schmidt, William Tarnow-Mordi, NeOProM Collaborative Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01124331 (Appropriate Levels of Oxygen Saturation for Extremely Preterm Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01124331 nacompletednot on this map

Appropriate Levels of Oxygen Saturation for Extremely Preterm Infants: Prospective Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SydneyRan2005 to 2014Enrolled4,965ConditionsInfant, Premature, Diseases, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Retinopathy of Prematurity, Infant, Newborn, DiseasesArmsHigher oxygen saturation target range (91%-95%), Lower oxygen saturation (85%-89%)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Cause and outcome of cerebellar mutism: evidence from a systematic review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa M AskieNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, (Parramatta Road), Camperdown, (2050), Australia. laskie@ctc.usyd.edu.au
Peter Brocklehurst
Brian A Darlow
Neil Finer
Barbara Schmidt
William Tarnow-Mordi
NeOProM Collaborative Group

Funding

CIHRMedical Research Council G0400415Medical Research Council MC_U122861323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe appropriate level of oxygenation for extremely preterm neonates (<28 weeks' gestation) to maximise the greatest chance of survival, without incurring significant morbidity, remains unknown. Infants exposed to lower levels of oxygen (targeting oxygen saturations of <90%) in the first weeks of life are at increased risk of death, cerebral palsy, patent ductus arteriosus, pulmonary vascular resistance and apnoea, whilst those maintained in higher levels of oxygen (targeting oxygen saturations of >90%) have been reported to have greater rates of morbidity including retinopathy of prematurity and chronic lung disease. In order to answer this clinical dilemma reliably, large scale trial evidence is needed. METHODS/

designTo detect a small but important 4% increase in death or severe disability in survivors, over 5000 neonates would need to be recruited. As extreme prematurity affects 1% of births, such a project undertaken by one trial group would be prohibitively lengthy and expensive. Hence, the Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis (NeOProM) Collaboration has been formed. A prospective meta-analysis (PMA) is one where studies are identified, evaluated, and determined to be eligible before the results of any included studies are known or published, thereby avoiding some of the potential biases inherent in standard, retrospective meta-analyses. This methodology provides the same strengths as a single large-scale multicentre randomised study whilst allowing greater pragmatic flexibility. The NeOProM Collaboration protocol (NCT01124331) has been agreed prior to the results of individual trials being available. This includes pre-specifying the hypotheses, inclusion criteria and outcome measures to be used. Each trial will first publish their respective results as they become available and the combined meta-analytic results, using individual patient data, will be published when all trials are complete. The primary outcome to be assessed is a composite outcome of death or major disability at 18 months - 2 years corrected age. Secondary outcomes include several measures of neonatal morbidity. The size of the combined dataset will allow the effect of the interventions to be explored more reliably with respect to pre-specified patient- and intervention-level characteristics. DISCUSSION: Results should be available by 2014.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicAustraliaClinical ProtocolsClinical Trials as TopicCooperative BehaviorGestational AgeHumansHyperoxiaHypoxiaInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesMulticenter Studies as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CareOxidative StressOxygenOxygen

Identifiers

PMID21235822
PMCPMC3025869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.