Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21235816›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2011

The intersection between sex and drugs: a cross-sectional study among the spouses of injection drug users in Chennai, India.

Sunil S Solomon, Aylur K Srikrishnan, David D Celentano, Sethulakshmi C Johnson, Canjeevaram K Vasudevan, Kailapuri G Murugavel, Santhanam Anand, M Suresh Kumar, Suniti Solomon, Shruti H Mehta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sunil S SolomonYR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education, VHS Adyar, Taramani, Chennai 600113, India.
Aylur K Srikrishnan
David D Celentano
Sethulakshmi C Johnson
Canjeevaram K Vasudevan
Kailapuri G Murugavel
Santhanam Anand
M Suresh Kumar
Suniti Solomon
Shruti H Mehta
YR Gaitonde Centre for AIDS Research and Education · INJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

TUBERCULOSIS INTERNATIONAL TRAINING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMD43TW000010 · FIC · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEYRER, CHRISTOPHER C. · 1988 to 2012
$19.8M
INCIDENCE OF HIV INFECTIONS IN A COHORT OF IV DRUG USERSR01DA012568 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MEHTA, SHRUTI H · 1999 to 2017
$15.5M
FIC NIH HHS 2D-43-TW000010-20-AITRPNIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012568NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA-12568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is estimated that there are up to 1.1 million injection drug users (IDUs) in India; the majority are likely married. We characterize HIV, hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) prevalence and the risk environment of a sample of spouses of IDUs.

methodsA cohort of 1158 IDUs (99% male) was recruited in Chennai, India from 2005-06. A convenience sample of 400 spouses of the male IDUs in this cohort was recruited in 2009. A risk assessment questionnaire was administered and a blood sample collected. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with prevalent HIV.

resultsMedian age was 31 years; thirteen percent were widowed and 7% were not currently living with their spouse. Only 4 (1%) reported ever injecting drugs; Twenty-two percent and 25% reported ever using non-injection drugs and alcohol, respectively. The majority had one lifetime sexual partner and 37 (9%) reporting exchanging sex. Only 7% always used condoms with their regular partner. HIV, HBV and HCV prevalence were 2.5%, 3.8% and 0.5%, respectively; among spouses of HIV+ IDUs (n = 78), HIV prevalence was 10.3%. The strongest predictor of HIV was spousal HIV status (OR: 17.9; p < 0.001). Fifty-six percent of women had ever experienced intimate partner violence; Eight-six percent reported sexual violence.

conclusionsOur finding of a 10-fold higher HIV prevalence among spouses of IDUs compared with general population women indicates their vulnerability; prevalence is likely to increase given the context of low condom use and frequent sexual violence. Prevention efforts directed at IDUs should also include programs for spouses.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesCondomsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHepatitis BHepatitis CHIV InfectionsHumansIndiaLogistic ModelsMalePrevalenceRisk FactorsSex OffensesSexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID21235816
PMCPMC3031221
OpenAlexW2088108385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.