Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21235763›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2011

Effect of primary care physicians' use of estimated glomerular filtration rate on the timing of their subspecialty referral decisions.

Raquel C Greer, Neil R Powe, Bernard G Jaar, Misty U Troll, L Ebony Boulware

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
20.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MDRD vs. CKD-EPI in comparison toBMC nephrology · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Educating Patients about CKD: The Path to Self-Management and Patient-Centered Care.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2016
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Implementation of a CKD checklist for primary care providers.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raquel C GreerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. rfcharle@jhmi.edu
Neil R Powe
Bernard G Jaar
Misty U Troll
L Ebony Boulware
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN HEART &VASCULAR DISEASET32HL007180 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARUTHUR, NISA M · 1985 to 2020
$11.4M
Information and Financial Interventions for Kidney Donation in African AmericansR01DK079682 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E · 2007 to 2011
$1.3M
Clinical and Behavioral Determinants of CKD DisparitiesK23DK070757 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E · 2006 to 2010
$724k
NHLBI NIH HHS 5 T32 HL007180NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK070757NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK079682PHS HHS K240502643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care providers' suboptimal recognition of the severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD) may contribute to untimely referrals of patients with CKD to subspecialty care. It is unknown whether U.S. primary care physicians' use of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) rather than serum creatinine to estimate CKD severity could improve the timeliness of their subspecialty referral decisions.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study of 154 United States primary care physicians to assess the effect of use of eGFR (versus creatinine) on the timing of their subspecialty referrals. Primary care physicians completed a questionnaire featuring questions regarding a hypothetical White or African American patient with progressing CKD. We asked primary care physicians to identify the serum creatinine and eGFR levels at which they would recommend patients like the hypothetical patient be referred for subspecialty evaluation. We assessed significant improvement in the timing [from eGFR < 30 to ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73m(2)) of their recommended referrals based on their use of creatinine versus eGFR.

resultsPrimary care physicians recommended subspecialty referrals later (CKD more advanced) when using creatinine versus eGFR to assess kidney function [median eGFR 32 versus 55 mL/min/1.73m(2), p < 0.001]. Forty percent of primary care physicians significantly improved the timing of their referrals when basing their recommendations on eGFR. Improved timing occurred more frequently among primary care physicians practicing in academic (versus non-academic) practices or presented with White (versus African American) hypothetical patients [adjusted percentage(95% CI): 70% (45-87) versus 37% (reference) and 57% (39-73) versus 25% (reference), respectively, both p ≤ 0.01).

conclusionsPrimary care physicians recommended subspecialty referrals earlier when using eGFR (versus creatinine) to assess kidney function. Enhanced use of eGFR by primary care physicians' could lead to more timely subspecialty care and improved clinical outcomes for patients with CKD.

Indexed as

Glomerular Filtration RateCreatinineHumansKidney Failure, ChronicPhysicians, Primary CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'Referral and ConsultationTime FactorsUnited StatesCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID21235763
PMCPMC3033812
OpenAlexW2142332115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.