ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2011
Engagement of the B cell receptor for antigen differentially affects B cell responses to Toll-like receptor-7 agonists and antagonists in BXSB mice.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Roles of B Cell-Intrinsic TLR Signals in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2015Review
- Modulating toll-like receptor 7 and 9 responses as therapy for allergy and autoimmunity.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nucleic acid sensors of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) family play a well-established role in the pathogenesis of lupus. This is particularly true for a single-stranded RNA-sensing TLR-7 receptor, as lupus mice lacking TLR-7 show ameliorated disease. Cytosine-guanosine dinucleotide (CpG)-DNA-sensing TLR-9, conversely, has a complex regulatory role in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Much less is known about whether signals through the B cell receptor for antigen (BCR) may affect the ability of B cells to respond to suboptimal TLR-7 agonists and antagonists. We studied this question in prediseased BXSB male and female B cells. We found that male B cells responded more vigorously to numerous TLR-7 ligands and this responsiveness was enhanced further upon co-engagement of the BCR. This synergy was seen primarily with the interleukin (IL)-6 secretion. A number of 32-mer inhibitory oligonucleotides (INH-ODNs) with a nuclease-resistant phosphorothioate backbone were capable of blocking TLR-7, but not BCR-induced B cell activation, with an inhibitory concentration (IC)(50) of approximately 100 nm. Surprisingly, while the presence of a single TGC motif at the 5' end of an ODN did not increase its inhibitory capacity, INH-ODNs containing multiple TGC motifs had greater inhibitory potency. When BCR and TLR-7 were co-engaged, INH-ODNs showed a differential effect on B cell activation. Whereas apoptosis protection and G1-M entry completely escaped suppression, IL-6 secretion remained sensitive to inhibition, although with a 10-fold lower potency. Our results suggest that while TLR-7 antagonists may be considered as lupus therapeutics, simultaneous co-engagement of the TLR-7 and BCR might favour autoreactive B cell survival. This hypothesis needs further experimental validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.