ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2011
Gastric cancer: surgery in 2011.
Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of spleen-preserving total gastrectomy on postoperative infectious complications and 5-year overall survival: systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2019Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effectiveness of 5-flurouracil-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally-advanced gastric/gastroesophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2012Pooled it
- A phase II trial of ixabepilone in Asian patients with advanced gastric cancer previously treated with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology · 2012Trial
- [Evidence for the extent and oncological benefit of lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for esophageal cancer patients based on SEER Asian population.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- The role of postoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of postoperative major complications following total gastrectomy for gastric cancer.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2022Article
- Should Signet Ring Cell Histology Alter the Treatment Approach for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer?Annals of surgical oncology · 2021Article
- Association of serum levels of deoxyribose 1-phosphate and S-lactoylglutathione with neoadjuvant chemotherapy sensitivity in patients with gastric cancer: A metabolomics study.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Development and external validation of preoperative risk models for operative morbidities after total gastrectomy using a Japanese web-based nationwide registry.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2017Article
- Approaches and genetic determinants in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.Oncotarget · 2017Review
- Role of histological regression grade after two neoadjuvant approaches with or without radiotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.British journal of cancer · 2016Article
- Gastric cancer: Current status of lymph node dissection.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- Histological evaluation for chemotherapeutic responses of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Multimodal treatment of gastric cancer in the west: Where are we going?World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Review
- Preliminary study of surgical audit for overall survival following gastric cancer resection.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2015Article
- Adjuvant and/or neoadjuvant therapy for gastric cancer? A perspective review.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTreatment of gastric cancer is more and more becoming an individualized decision. The choice of the optimal approach is based on prognostic factors, on the anatomic site of the tumor, and on expectations about the response to neoadjuvant treatment. Early gastric cancer that is limited to the mucosal layer is the domain of endoscopic resections. As soon as the submucosal layer is invaded, surgical strategies with adequate lymphadenectomy become necessary. DISCUSSION: In many East Asian Centers and some other centers in the world, these tumors are resected by a laparoscopic approach. With a high experience, this can be done with excellent quality and outcome. In locally advanced gastric cancer, multimodal treatment can improve survival in comparison to surgery alone. However, the strategies differ significantly around the world. While adjuvant chemoradiotherapy is standard in the USA, in Europe, perioperative chemotherapy is the first choice, and in Japan, adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended. In Europe, three randomized phase III studies on the value of preoperative chemotherapy have been performed. Two of them have shown that perioperative chemotherapy does significantly improve the survival of patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach and of the esophagogastric junction. The one including only preoperative chemotherapy failed to show a survival benefit for the combined treatment arm but showed excellent outcomes in both the surgery alone and the preoperative chemotherapy arms. Based on these studies, patients with stage II or stage III disease are now treated with perioperative chemotherapy. Additionally, it is generally accepted for more than 10 years now that responding patients have a significantly improved prognosis compared to nonresponding patients. The percentage of responding patients varies depending on the applied regimen between 20% and 45%. Therefore, early response evaluation or response prediction is an utmost important field of research. Proximal tumors are treated with a transhiatal extended gastrectomy, tumors in the middle third with a total gastrectomy, and distal tumors with a subtotal gastrectomy, if possible. Modified D2 lymphadenectomy avoiding splenectomy is now accepted as the standard procedure, providing improved prognosis for certain subgroups of patients. Individualized resection and lymphadenectomy techniques for early tumor stages and response-based neoadjuvant concepts for locally advanced tumors are the challenge for the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.