Improving the quality of training programs in intensive care: a view from the ESICM.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Discrepancy between the Demand and Supply of Intensive Care Unit Beds in South Korea from 2011 to 2019: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.Yonsei medical journal · 2021
   Article
2. Neuroendocrine Modulation of the Immune Response after Trauma and Sepsis: Does It Influence Outcome?Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
   Review
3. The variability of critical care bed numbers in Europe.Intensive care medicine · 2012
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  International standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine in Europe.2011

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as