Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21234547›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2011

Posterior intravaginal slingplasty: efficacy and complications in a continuous series of 118 cases.

Stefano Cosma, Mario Preti, Marco Mitidieri, Paolo Petruzzelli, Federica Possavino, Guido Menato

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Apical sling: an approach to posthysterectomy vault prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2016
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Bilateral sacrospinous fixation without hysterectomy: 18-month follow-up.Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2015
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India · 2012
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stefano CosmaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy. cosmastefano@libero.it
Mario Preti
Marco Mitidieri
Paolo Petruzzelli
Federica Possavino
Guido Menato
University of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisPosterior intravaginal slingplasty (PIVS) is a minimally invasive procedure that aims to suspend vaginal vault. Our study evaluated efficacy and complications of PIVS at long-term follow-up.

methodsOne hundred eighteen consecutive women underwent PIVS operation for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage 3 or 4 vaginal cuff prolapse (VCP; 25 patients) or utero-vaginal prolapse (UVP; 93 patients). Apical vaginal wall at stage 0 or 1 was considered as cured.

resultsFollow-up mean duration was 58.6 months (range, 24-84 months). The success rate of PIVS was 96.6%. Some 8.5% mesh erosion (20% in patients with VCP and 5.4% with UVP), 2.5% vaginal-perineal fistula, and 3.4% paravaginal hematoma occurred. Neither erosion nor fistulas occurred with monofilament polypropylene mesh.

conclusionPIVS seems a safe and effective procedure for VCP and UVP. Vaginal erosion was mainly observed in patients with VCP treated with multifilament polypropylene mesh.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPelvic Organ ProlapseQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSurgical InstrumentsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID21234547
OpenAlexW2082902066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.