Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21234344›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedicine & biotechnology2011

Construction, characterization, and preliminary BAC-end sequence analysis of a bacterial artificial chromosome library of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis).

Jinke Lin, Dave Kudrna, Rod A Wing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedicine & biotechnology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. BAC-FISH Based Physical Map of Endangered CatfishInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Next-generation sequencing reveals differentially amplified tandem repeats as a major genome component of Northern Europe's oldest Camellia japonica.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jinke LinSchool of Plant Sciences, Arizona Genomics Institute, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721, USA.
Dave Kudrna
Rod A Wing

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the construction and characterization of a publicly available BAC library for the tea plant, Camellia sinensis. Using modified methods, the library was constructed with the aim of developing public molecular resources to advance tea plant genomics research. The library consists of a total of 401,280 clones with an average insert size of 135 kb, providing an approximate coverage of 13.5 haploid genome equivalents. No empty vector clones were observed in a random sampling of 576 BAC clones. Further analysis of 182 BAC-end sequences from randomly selected clones revealed a GC content of 40.35% and low chloroplast and mitochondrial contamination. Repetitive sequence analyses indicated that LTR retrotransposons were the most predominant sequence class (86.93%-87.24%), followed by DNA retrotransposons (11.16%-11.69%). Additionally, we found 25 simple sequence repeats (SSRs) that could potentially be used as genetic markers.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryCamellia sinensisChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialDNA, PlantMinisatellite RepeatsMutagenesis, InsertionalSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID21234344
PMCPMC3017946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.