ArticleAmerican journal of public health2011
Forcing the Navy to sell cigarettes on ships: how the tobacco industry and politicians torpedoed Navy tobacco control.
Article in American journal of public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Survey on smoking habits among seafarers.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2019Article
- The Influence of Men's Military Service on Smoking Across the Life Course.Journal of drug issues · 2017Article
- Installation Tobacco Control Programs in the U.S. Military.Military medicine · 2016Article
- Banning cigarette smoking on US Navy submarines: a case study.Tobacco control · 2015Article
- "It's not a priority when we're in combat": public health professionals and military tobacco control policy.American journal of public health · 2015Article
- Tobacco industry use of personal responsibility rhetoric in public relations and litigation: disguising freedom to blame as freedom of choice.American journal of public health · 2015Article
- Why ban the sale of cigarettes? The case for abolition.Tobacco control · 2013Article
- Military exceptionalism or tobacco exceptionalism: how civilian health leaders' beliefs may impede military tobacco control efforts.American journal of public health · 2013Article
- "They're going to die anyway": smoking shelters at veterans' facilities.American journal of public health · 2013Article
- Why strong tobacco control measures "can't" be implemented in the U.S. Military: a qualitative analysis.Military medicine · 2012Article
- Mediatory myths in the U.S. military: tobacco use as "stress relief".American journal of health promotion : AJHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 1986, the US Navy announced the goal of becoming smoke-free by 2000. However, efforts to restrict tobacco sales and use aboard the USS Roosevelt prompted tobacco industry lobbyists to persuade their allies in Congress to legislate that all naval ships must sell tobacco. Congress also removed control of ships' stores from the Navy. By 1993, the Navy abandoned its smoke-free goal entirely and promised smokers a place to smoke on all ships. Congressional complicity in promoting the agenda of the tobacco industry thwarted the Navy's efforts to achieve a healthy military workforce. Because of military lobbying constraints, civilian pressure on Congress may be necessary to establish effective tobacco control policies in the armed forces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.