Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21233429›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2011

An applied ecological framework for evaluating infrastructure to promote walking and cycling: the iConnect study.

David Ogilvie, Fiona Bull, Jane Powell, Ashley R Cooper, Christian Brand, Nanette Mutrie, John Preston, Harry Rutter, iConnect Consortium

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
27.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Physical activity and the environment: conceptual review and framework for intervention research.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Interventions to promote cycling: systematic review.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2010
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Uncovering How Urban Regeneration Programs May Stimulate Leisure-time Walking Among Adults in Deprived Areas: A Realist Review.International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

David OgilvieMedical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK. david.ogilvie@mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk
Fiona Bull
Jane Powell
Ashley R Cooper
Christian Brand
Nanette Mutrie
John Preston
Harry Rutter
iConnect Consortium
Centre For Development Studies · INCommunicating Diet and Activity ResearchLoughborough University · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of the West of England · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationMedical Research Council MC_U106179474Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving infrastructure for walking and cycling is increasingly recommended as a means to promote physical activity, prevent obesity, and reduce traffic congestion and carbon emissions. However, limited evidence from intervention studies exists to support this approach. Drawing on classic epidemiological methods, psychological and ecological models of behavior change, and the principles of realistic evaluation, we have developed an applied ecological framework by which current theories about the behavioral effects of environmental change may be tested in heterogeneous and complex intervention settings. Our framework guides study design and analysis by specifying the most important data to be collected and relations to be tested to confirm or refute specific hypotheses and thereby refine the underlying theories.

Indexed as

Environment DesignHealth BehaviorBicyclingCity PlanningHealth PromotionHumansModels, TheoreticalResidence CharacteristicsSocial EnvironmentTransportationUnited KingdomWalking

Identifiers

PMID21233429
PMCPMC3036680
OpenAlexW2113060318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.