Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21233170›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2011

Different modes of interaction by TIAR and HuR with target RNA and DNA.

Henry S Kim, Matthew C J Wilce, Yano M K Yoga, Nicole R Pendini, Menachem J Gunzburg, Nathan P Cowieson, Gerald M Wilson, Bryan R G Williams, Myriam Gorospe, Jacqueline A Wilce

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. T-Cell Intracellular Antigen 1-Like Protein in Physiology and Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. eLife · 2021
    Article
  10. Approaches for measuring the dynamics of RNA-protein interactions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Posttranslational control of HuR function.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Henry S KimDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia.
Matthew C J Wilce
Yano M K Yoga
Nicole R Pendini
Menachem J Gunzburg
Nathan P Cowieson
Gerald M Wilson
Bryan R G Williams
Myriam Gorospe
Jacqueline A Wilce
Monash University · AUUniversity of Baltimore · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Mechanisms directing oncoprotein and cytokine mRNA decayR01CA102428 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WILSON, GERALD M. · 2003 to 2013
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TIAR and HuR are mRNA-binding proteins that play important roles in the regulation of translation. They both possess three RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) and bind to AU-rich elements (AREs), with seemingly overlapping specificity. Here we show using SPR that TIAR and HuR bind to both U-rich and AU-rich RNA in the nanomolar range, with higher overall affinity for U-rich RNA. However, the higher affinity for U-rich sequences is mainly due to faster association with U-rich RNA, which we propose is a reflection of the higher probability of association. Differences between TIAR and HuR are observed in their modes of binding to RNA. TIAR is able to bind deoxy-oligonucleotides with nanomolar affinity, whereas HuR affinity is reduced to a micromolar level. Studies with U-rich DNA reveal that TIAR binding depends less on the 2'-hydroxyl group of RNA than HuR binding. Finally we show that SAXS data, recorded for the first two domains of TIAR in complex with RNA, are more consistent with a flexible, elongated shape and not the compact shape that the first two domains of Hu proteins adopt upon binding to RNA. We thus propose that these triple-RRM proteins, which compete for the same binding sites in cells, interact with their targets in fundamentally different ways.

Indexed as

AdenineAntigens, SurfaceDNAELAV-Like Protein 1ELAV ProteinsKineticsModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationRNARNA-Binding ProteinsScattering, Small AngleUracilX-Ray DiffractionAdenineAntigens, SurfaceDNAELAVL1 protein, humanELAV-Like Protein 1ELAV ProteinsRNARNA-Binding ProteinsUracil

Identifiers

PMID21233170
PMCPMC3035456
OpenAlexW2110315273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.