ReviewSeminars in hematology2011
Development of early treatment strategies for high-risk myeloma precursor disease in the future.
Review in Seminars in hematology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current status of drug development for patients with multiple myeloma: a review of comparison in China and the rest of world.Antibody therapeutics · 2023Review
- MiR-16 regulates crosstalk in NF-κB tolerogenic inflammatory signaling between myeloma cells and bone marrow macrophages.JCI insight · 2019Article
- When an Analytical Interference Is a Useful Diagnostic Tool: Finding Monoclonal Gammopathies in Routine Analysis.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2016Article
- Modeling progression risk for smoldering multiple myeloma: results from a prospective clinical study.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Smoldering myeloma (SMM) is a precursor state of multiple myeloma. It is defined by an M-protein concentration ≥3 g/dL and/or ≥10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells, in the absence of end-organ damage. Based on clinical observations, the natural history of SMM varies greatly, from stable, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS)-like disease to highly progressive disease. Using conventional clinical markers, SMM patients can be stratified into clinical risk groups. However, due to considerable molecular heterogeneity, we currently lack reliable markers to predict prognosis for individual SMM patients. Based on the International Myeloma Working Group 2010 guidelines, patients diagnosed with MGUS and SMM should not be treated outside of clinical trials. Overall, treatment trials for MGUS patients are complicated, as these individuals are relatively healthy and the majority has a low life-time risk of progression, especially when other causes of death are taken into account. In contrast to MGUS, early treatment strategies for SMM are particularly attractive, as the rate of progression to multiple myeloma is substantially higher. Until recently, potent drugs with reasonable toxicity profiles have not been available for the development of early multiple myeloma treatment strategies. This review discusses how the integration of novel biological markers and clinical monitoring of SMM could facilitate the development of early treatment strategies for high-risk SMM patients in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.