ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2010
Pheromone transduction in moths.
Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Asymmetric Evolution of Antennal Cell Types Underlies a Derived Ammonia-Sensing Logic for Ecological Adaptation in Bactrocera dorsalis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- The diversity of lepidopteran spatial orientation strategies - neuronal mechanisms and emerging challenges in a changing world.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026Review
- Identification and Functional Disparity of Pheromone-Binding Proteins from Tomato LeafminerJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025Article
- Locusts adopt IPScience advances · 2025Article
- Pheromone-Binding Proteins in Pest Control: From Molecular Insights to Real-World Applications.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025Review
- Exploiting TRP channel diversity in insects: a pathway to next-generation pest management.Archives of toxicology · 2025Review
- Evolutionary Process Underlying Receptor Gene Expansion and Cellular Divergence of Olfactory Sensory Neurons in Honeybees.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Hawkmoth Pheromone Transduction Involves G-Protein-Dependent Phospholipase Cβ Signaling.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Type-specific molecular signaling architectures and synaptic plasticity ofFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Diverse mechanisms of taste coding inScience advances · 2023Article
- Contribution of membrane-associated oscillators to biological timing at different timescales.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Modulation of the NO-cGMP pathway has no effect on olfactory responses in theFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023Article
- Molecular Characterization and Expression Patterns of Two Pheromone-Binding Proteins from the Diurnal MothInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Why a Diffusing Single-Molecule can be Detected in Few Minutes by a Large Capturing Bioelectronic Interface.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Chemoreceptor co-expression ineLife · 2022Article
- Candidate chemosensory receptors in the antennae and maxillae ofFrontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- A single point mutation causes one-way alteration of pheromone receptor function in twoiScience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calling female moths attract their mates late at night with intermittent release of a species-specific sex-pheromone blend. Mean frequency of pheromone filaments encodes distance to the calling female. In their zig-zagging upwind search male moths encounter turbulent pheromone blend filaments at highly variable concentrations and frequencies. The male moth antennae are delicately designed to detect and distinguish even traces of these sex pheromones amongst the abundance of other odors. Its olfactory receptor neurons sense even single pheromone molecules and track intermittent pheromone filaments of highly variable frequencies up to about 30 Hz over a wide concentration range. In the hawkmoth Manduca sexta brief, weak pheromone stimuli as encountered during flight are detected via a metabotropic PLCβ-dependent signal transduction cascade which leads to transient changes in intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations. Strong or long pheromone stimuli, which are possibly perceived in direct contact with the female, activate receptor-guanylyl cyclases causing long-term adaptation. In addition, depending on endogenous rhythms of the moth's physiological state, hormones such as the stress hormone octopamine modulate second messenger levels in sensory neurons. High octopamine levels during the activity phase maximize temporal resolution cAMP-dependently as a prerequisite to mate location. Thus, I suggest that sliding adjustment of odor response threshold and kinetics is based upon relative concentration ratios of intracellular Ca(2+) and cyclic nucleotide levels which gate different ion channels synergistically. In addition, I propose a new hypothesis for the cyclic nucleotide-dependent ion channel formed by insect olfactory receptor/coreceptor complexes. Instead of being employed for an ionotropic mechanism of odor detection it is proposed to control subthreshold membrane potential oscillation of sensory neurons, as a basis for temporal encoding of odors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.