Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21228696›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2011

Air pollution, lung function, and physical symptoms in communities near concentrated Swine feeding operations.

Leah Schinasi, Rachel Avery Horton, Virginia T Guidry, Steve Wing, Stephen W Marshall, Kimberly B Morland

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Industrial odour pollution and human health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. The Scientific Basis for Occupational Exposure Limits for Hydrogen Sulphide-A Critical Commentary.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Influence of Rural Environmental Factors in Asthma.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leah SchinasiDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599–7435,USA. steve_wing@unc.edu
Rachel Avery Horton
Virginia T Guidry
Steve Wing
Stephen W Marshall
Kimberly B Morland
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · US

Funding

Biostatstics for Research in Environmental HealthT32ES007018 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel, Rebecca Fry · 1985 to 2026
$31.3M
Community Health Effects of Industrial Hog OperationsR01ES011359 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WING, STEVEN B · 2001 to 2005
$1.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES011359NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcentrated animal feeding operations emit air pollutants that may affect health. We examined associations of reported hog odor and of monitored air pollutants with physical symptoms and lung function in people living within 1.5 miles of hog operations.

methodsBetween September 2003 and September 2005, we measured hydrogen sulfide (H2S), endotoxin, and particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5, and PM2.5-10) for approximately 2-week periods in each of 16 eastern North Carolina communities. During the same time periods, 101 adults sat outside their homes twice a day for 10 minutes, reported hog odor and physical symptoms, and measured their lung function. Conditional fixed-effects logistic and linear regression models were used to derive estimates of associations.

resultsThe log odds (±1 standard error) of acute eye irritation following 10 minutes outdoors increased by 0.53 (±0.06) for every unit increase in odor, by 0.15 (±0.06) per 1 ppb of H2S, and by 0.36 (±0.11) per 10 μg/m of PM10. Odor and H2S were also associated with irritation and respiratory symptoms in the previous 12 hours. The log odds of difficulty breathing increased by 0.50 (±0.15) per unit of odor. A 10 μg/m increase in mean 12-hour PM2.5 was associated with increased log odds of wheezing (0.84 ± 0.29) and declines in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (-0.04 ± 0.02 L). A 10 EU/mg increase in endotoxin was associated with increased log odds of sore throat (0.10 ± 0.05), chest tightness (0.09 ± 0.04), and nausea (0.10 ± 0.05).

conclusionsPollutants measured near hog operations are related to acute physical symptoms in a longitudinal study using analyses that preclude confounding by time-invariant characteristics of individuals.

Indexed as

Respiratory Function TestsSerotypingSwineAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAir PollutionAnimal FeedAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHumansHydrogen SulfideLinear ModelsLogistic ModelsLungHydrogen Sulfide

Identifiers

PMID21228696
PMCPMC5800517
OpenAlexW2041695344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.