ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2011
Access to clinical trial data.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.Annals of internal medicine · 2013 · on this mapGuideline
- SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- ClinicalTrials.gov and Drugs@FDA: A Comparison of Results Reporting for New Drug Approval Trials.Annals of internal medicine · 2016Article
- SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2015Article
- Predictors of clinical trial data sharing: exploratory analysis of a cross-sectional survey.Trials · 2014Article
- Research accomplishments that are too good to be true: comment.Intensive care medicine · 2014Article
- Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research.Lancet (London, England) · 2014Article
- Sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: an opinion survey regarding the establishment of a central repository.PloS one · 2014Article
- SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2013 · on this mapArticle
- Sharing of clinical trial data among trialists: a cross sectional survey.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2012Article
- Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2012Article
- Disclosure of investigators' recruitment performance in multicenter clinical trials: a further step for research transparency.PLoS medicine · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21228020What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.