Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21227671›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in immunology2011

The invention of lymphocytes.

Ellen Hsu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in immunology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis: a historical and comprehensive review.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Lamprey immunity is far from primitive.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  10. T cells home to the thymus and control infection.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2013
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ellen HsuDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, State University of New York and Health Science Center at Brooklyn, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA. hsue@hscbklyn.edu
State University of New York · US

Funding

Isotype Exclusion and Hypermutation in the Nurse SharkR01GM068095 · NIGMS · SUNY DOWNSTATE MEDICAL CENTER · PI HSU, ELLEN · 2004 to 2017
$3.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM068095NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM068095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lamprey and hagfish are surviving representatives of the most ancient vertebrates. They possess adaptive immune systems based on a vast, somatically diversified repertoire of lymphocyte-bound antigen receptors. Despite these similarities to antibody and T cell receptors (TCR) of later vertebrates, the variable lymphocyte receptors (VLR) are not related to the immunoglobulin (Ig)-superfamily of genes; and instead of V(D)J recombination VLR are somatically assembled by a gene conversion process. However, recent studies have revealed two lamprey lymphocyte subsets so closely resembling B cells and T cells that separate lymphocyte lineages must have already existed in the ancestral vertebrate, before Ig/TCR emergence. VLR and Ig/TCR arose independently, but the convergent evolution they display actually reflects their selection in cells with specialized functions.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityAnimalsEvolution, MolecularHumansLymphocytesReceptors, AntigenReceptors, Antigen

Identifiers

PMID21227671
PMCPMC3073649
OpenAlexW2043803759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.