Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21227494›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2011

Reproductive health, and child health and nutrition in India: meeting the challenge.

Vinod Kumar Paul, Harshpal Singh Sachdev, Dileep Mavalankar, Prema Ramachandran, Mari Jeeva Sankar, Nita Bhandari, Vishnubhatla Sreenivas, Thiagarajan Sundararaman, Dipti Govil, David Osrin and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
46.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 301 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Perinatal Mortality in South Asia: Systematic Review of Observational Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Spatial Distribution and Determinants of Fertility in India.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Vinod Kumar PaulAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. vinodkpaul@hotmail.com
Harshpal Singh Sachdev
Dileep Mavalankar
Prema Ramachandran
Mari Jeeva Sankar
Nita Bhandari
Vishnubhatla Sreenivas
Thiagarajan Sundararaman
Dipti Govil
David Osrin
Betty Kirkwood
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INIIHMR University · INIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabad · INLondon International Development Centre · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNational Health Systems Resource Centre · INNutrition Foundation of India · INSitaram Bhartia Institute of Science and Research · INSociety for Applied Studies · IN

Funding

Wellcome Trust 081052Wellcome Trust 091561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

India, with a population of more than 1 billion people, has many challenges in improving the health and nutrition of its citizens. Steady declines have been noted in fertility, maternal, infant and child mortalities, and the prevalence of severe manifestations of nutritional deficiencies, but the pace has been slow and falls short of national and Millennium Development Goal targets. The likely explanations include social inequities, disparities in health systems between and within states, and consequences of urbanisation and demographic transition. In 2005, India embarked on the National Rural Health Mission, an extraordinary effort to strengthen the health systems. However, coverage of priority interventions remains insufficient, and the content and quality of existing interventions are suboptimum. Substantial unmet need for contraception remains, adolescent pregnancies are common, and access to safe abortion is inadequate. Increases in the numbers of deliveries in institutions have not been matched by improvements in the quality of intrapartum and neonatal care. Infants and young children do not get the health care they need; access to effective treatment for neonatal illness, diarrhoea, and pneumonia shows little improvement; and the coverage of nutrition programmes is inadequate. Absence of well functioning health systems is indicated by the inadequacies related to planning, financing, human resources, infrastructure, supply systems, governance, information, and monitoring. We provide a case for transformation of health systems through effective stewardship, decentralised planning in districts, a reasoned approach to financing that affects demand for health care, a campaign to create awareness and change health and nutrition behaviour, and revision of programmes for child nutrition on the basis of evidence. This agenda needs political commitment of the highest order and the development of a people's movement.

Indexed as

Child WelfareHealth Services Needs and DemandMaternal WelfareAbortion, InducedBirth WeightBudgetsChildChild Health ServicesChild MortalityChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaChild Nutrition DisordersCommunity Health CentersCultureDeveloping CountriesFamily Planning ServicesFemale

Identifiers

PMID21227494
PMCPMC3341742
OpenAlexW1993680954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.