Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21226928›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2011

Incorporating higher-order representative features improves prediction in network-based cancer prognosis analysis.

Shuangge Ma, Michael R Kosorok, Jian Huang, Ying Dai

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. High-Dimensional Gene-Environment Interaction Analysis.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Risk Factors of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.Expert opinion on medical diagnostics · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuangge MaSchool of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. shuangge.ma@yale.edu
Michael R Kosorok
Jian Huang
Ying Dai

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Statistical Methods for Cancer Clinical TrialsP01CA142538 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TSIATIS, ANASTASIOS A · 2010 to 2019
$21.3M
Novel Methods for Integrative Analysis of Cancer Genomic DataR01CA142774 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, SHUANGGE · 2010 to 2013
$1.3M
Regularized Classification & Survival Analysis for Expression Profiling of CancerR01CA120988 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI HUANG, JIAN · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
Effective clustering penalized methods for genomic biomarker selectionR03LM009754 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, SHUANGGE · 2009 to 2010
$174k
NCI NIH HHS CA120988NCI NIH HHS CA142538NCI NIH HHS CA142774NCI NIH HHS P01 CA142538NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NLM NIH HHS LM009754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn cancer prognosis studies with gene expression measurements, an important goal is to construct gene signatures with predictive power. In this study, we describe the coordination among genes using the weighted coexpression network, where nodes represent genes and nodes are connected if the corresponding genes have similar expression patterns across samples. There are subsets of nodes, called modules, that are tightly connected to each other. In several published studies, it has been suggested that the first principal components of individual modules, also referred to as "eigengenes", may sufficiently represent the corresponding modules.

resultsIn this article, we refer to principal components and their functions as representative features". We investigate higher-order representative features, which include the principal components other than the first ones and second order terms (quadratics and interactions). Two gradient thresholding methods are adopted for regularized estimation and feature selection. Analysis of six prognosis studies on lymphoma and breast cancer shows that incorporating higher-order representative features improves prediction performance over using eigengenes only. Simulation study further shows that prediction performance can be less satisfactory if the representative feature set is not properly chosen.

conclusionsThis study introduces multiple ways of defining the representative features and effective thresholding regularized estimation approaches. It provides convincing evidence that the higher-order representative features may have important implications for the prediction of cancer prognosis.

Indexed as

Principal Component AnalysisAlgorithmsDNA, ComplementaryFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansModels, StatisticalNeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisDNA, Complementary

Identifiers

PMID21226928
PMCPMC3037289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.