ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2011
Forward suppression in the auditory cortex is frequency-specific.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synaptic Recruitment Enhances Gap Termination Responses in Auditory Cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2020Article
- Behavioral and neuronal study of inhibition of return in barn owls.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Neural Modulation of the Primary Auditory Cortex by Intracortical Microstimulation with a Bio-Inspired Electronic System.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
- Cortical Microcircuit Mechanisms of Mismatch Negativity and Its Underlying Subcomponents.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2020Review
- Diverse effects of stimulus history in waking mouse auditory cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Spatial Processing Is Frequency Specific in Auditory Cortex But Not in the Midbrain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Echo-acoustic flow shapes object representation in spatially complex acoustic scenes.Journal of neurophysiology · 2017Article
- Vocal sequences suppress spiking in the bat auditory cortex while evoking concomitant steady-state local field potentials.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Comodulation Enhances Signal Detection via Priming of Auditory Cortical Circuits.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016Article
- Enhancement of forward suppression begins in the ventral cochlear nucleus.Brain research · 2016Article
- Neurons in the inferior colliculus of the rat show stimulus-specific adaptation for frequency, but not for intensity.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Emergence of Spatial Stream Segregation in the Ascending Auditory Pathway.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015Article
- Stream segregation in the anesthetized auditory cortex.Hearing research · 2015Article
- Modulation-frequency-specific adaptation in awake auditory cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015Article
- A model of order-selectivity based on dynamic changes in the balance of excitation and inhibition produced by short-term synaptic plasticity.Journal of neurophysiology · 2015Article
- Frequency-specific adaptation and its underlying circuit model in the auditory midbrain.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2015Article
- Neuronal adaptation, novelty detection and regularity encoding in audition.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2014Article
- The specificity of stimulus-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex increases with repeated exposure to the adapting stimulus.Journal of neurophysiology · 2013Article
- Searching for the mismatch negativity in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey: deviance detection or stimulus specific adaptation?The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated how physiologically observed forward suppression interacts with stimulus frequency in neuronal responses in the guinea pig auditory cortex. The temporal order and frequency proximity of sounds influence both their perception and neuronal responses. Psychophysically, preceding sounds (conditioners) can make successive sounds (probes) harder to hear. These effects are larger when the two sounds are spectrally similar. Physiological forward suppression is usually maximal for conditioner tones near to a unit's characteristic frequency (CF), the frequency to which a neuron is most sensitive. However, in most physiological studies, the frequency of the probe tone and CF are identical, so the role of unit CF and probe frequency cannot be distinguished. Here, we systemically varied the frequency of the probe tone, and found that the tuning of suppression was often more closely related to the frequency of the probe tone than to the unit's CF, i.e. suppressed tuning was specific to probe frequency. This relationship was maintained for all measured gaps between the conditioner and the probe tones. However, when the probe frequency and CF were similar, CF tended to determine suppressed tuning. In addition, the bandwidth of suppression was slightly wider for off-CF probes. Changes in tuning were also reflected in the firing rate in response to probe tones, which was maximally reduced when probe and conditioner tones were matched in frequency. These data are consistent with the idea that cortical neurons receive convergent inputs with a wide range of tuning properties that can adapt independently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.