ReviewExpert opinion on drug safety2011
Safety of micafungin in infants: insights into optimal dosing.
Review in Expert opinion on drug safety, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Micafungin in premature and non-premature infants: a systematic review of 9 clinical trials.The Pediatric infectious disease journal · 2014Pooled it
- High-Dose Micafungin in Neonates and Young Infants with Invasive Candidiasis: Results of a Phase 2 Study.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021Trial
- Pharmacokinetics and safety of fluconazole and micafungin in neonates with systemic candidiasis: a randomized, open-label clinical trial.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Trial
- Review
- Navigating the New Reality: A Review of the Epidemiological, Clinical, and Microbiological Characteristics ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Antifungal Drugs for Invasive Candida Infections (ICI) in Neonates: Future Perspectives.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2019Review
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Micafungin.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2018Review
- High-Dose Micafungin for Preterm Neonates and Infants with Invasive and Central Nervous System Candidiasis.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2016Article
- Old and new: appropriate dosing for neonatal antifungal drugs in the nursery.Early human development · 2013Review
- Invasive fungal infections in infants-focus on anidulafungin.Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionInvasive Candida infections are a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Micafungin is a promising therapeutic option for treatment of invasive fungal infections in infants given its safety profile in older children and adults. Understanding micafungin safety in infants is particularly important because antifungals are most often used in premature infants with multiple underlying medical conditions in a critical care setting. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the literature evaluating the safety profile of micafungin in infants and offers recommendations for optimal dosing for treatment of invasive candidiasis in the NICU setting. The review has been performed using a Medline search in September 2010 for related articles from 1990 to the present with the Mesh related terms 'micafungin' and 'safety' in combination with the free words 'antifungal', 'candidiasis', 'drug toxicity', 'infant, premature' and 'infant, newborn'. EXPERT OPINION: Despite the limitations of the existing literature, we believe micafungin dosing of 10 mg/kg/day for all term and preterm infants is a viable treatment option in the NICU setting for management of invasive candidiasis. Although the number of infants for whom safety data are reported is small, higher doses of micafungin appear safe and well tolerated in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.