Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21226610›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of medicine2011

Imaging of atherosclerosis.

D R J Owen, A C Lindsay, R P Choudhury, Z A Fayad

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Potential Role of Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy forMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Diagnostic imaging in the management of patients with metabolic syndrome.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Comparison of CT and CMR for detection and quantification of carotid artery calcification: the Rotterdam Study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

D R J OwenDepartment of Experimental Medicine and Toxicology, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom. d.owen@imperial.ac.uk
A C Lindsay
R P Choudhury
Z A Fayad

Funding

MR/PET Imaging of coronary atherosclerosisR01HL071021 · NHLBI · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI FAYAD, ZAHI A. · 2002 to 2019
$7.8M
British Heart FoundationNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL071021Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is now well recognized that the atherosclerotic plaques responsible for thrombus formation are not necessarily those that impinge most on the lumen of the vessel. Nevertheless, clinical investigations for atherosclerosis still focus on quantifying the degree of stenosis caused by plaques. Many of the features associated with a high-risk plaque, including a thin fibrous cap, large necrotic core, macrophage infiltration, neovascularization, and intraplaque hemorrhage, can now be probed by novel imaging techniques. Each technique has its own strengths and drawbacks. In this article, we review the various imaging modalities used for the evaluation and quantification of atherosclerosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAtherosclerosisCarotid Artery DiseasesCarotid StenosisConstriction, PathologicEndothelium, VascularFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMicePlaque, AtheroscleroticPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID21226610
PMCPMC4041162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.