ArticleHawaii medical journal2010
Infiltrating mammary carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells.
Article in Hawaii medical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The "Forgotten" Subtypes of Breast Carcinoma: A Systematic Review of Selected Histological Variants Not Included or Not Recognized as Distinct Entities in the Current World Health Organization Classification of Breast Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Single-cell transcriptomics provide insight into metastasis-related subsets of breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2023Review
- Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer with Osteoclast-Like Giant Cells: A Case Report Based on the Gene Expression Profile for Changes in Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- Invasive breast carcinomas of no special type with osteoclast-like giant cells frequently have a luminal phenotype.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2014Article
- Mammary carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells: a case report.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mammary carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells is an uncommon variant. The following case examines a 36-year-old woman incidentally found to have a left breast mass on routine physical exam. Initial ultrasound-guided core biopsies revealed infiltrating mammary carcinoma with focal mucinous features, for which a left breast lumpectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy were performed. The sentinel lymph nodes were positive for metastatic mammary carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells on permanent section corresponding to the lumpectomy breast specimen, thus a left completion axillary node dissection was subsequently performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21225583PMC3071202What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.