Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21225425›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2011

PET functional volume delineation: a robustness and repeatability study.

Mathieu Hatt, Catherine Cheze Le Rest, Nidal Albarghach, Olivier Pradier, Dimitris Visvikis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Impact of tumor size and tracer uptake heterogeneity in (18)F-FDG PET and CT non-small cell lung cancer tumor delineation.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2011
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Joint EANM/SNMMI/ESTRO practice recommendations for the use of 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Review
  6. Interobserver Agreement on Automated Metabolic Tumor Volume Measurements of Deauville Score 4 and 5 Lesions at InterimJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Use of BaselineFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Radiomics in Oncological PET/CT: a Methodological Overview.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Review
  15. FDG PET/CT radiomics for predicting the outcome of locally advanced rectal cancer.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The potential ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mathieu HattINSERM, U650, LaTIM, CHU Morvan, Brest, 29200, France, hatt@univ-brest.fr.
Catherine Cheze Le Rest
Nidal Albarghach
Olivier Pradier
Dimitris Visvikis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCurrent state-of-the-art algorithms for functional uptake volume segmentation in PET imaging consist of threshold-based approaches, whose parameters often require specific optimization for a given scanner and associated reconstruction algorithms. Different advanced image segmentation approaches previously proposed and extensively validated, such as among others fuzzy C-means (FCM) clustering, or fuzzy locally adaptive bayesian (FLAB) algorithm have the potential to improve the robustness of functional uptake volume measurements. The objective of this study was to investigate robustness and repeatability with respect to various scanner models, reconstruction algorithms and acquisition conditions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Robustness was evaluated using a series of IEC phantom acquisitions carried out on different PET/CT scanners (Philips Gemini and Gemini Time-of-Flight, Siemens Biograph and GE Discovery LS) with their associated reconstruction algorithms (RAMLA, TF MLEM, OSEM). A range of acquisition parameters (contrast, duration) and reconstruction parameters (voxel size) were considered for each scanner model, and the repeatability of each method was evaluated on simulated and clinical tumours and compared to manual delineation.

resultsFor all the scanner models, acquisition parameters and reconstruction algorithms considered, the FLAB algorithm demonstrated higher robustness in delineation of the spheres with low mean errors (10%) and variability (5%), with respect to threshold-based methodologies and FCM. The repeatability provided by all segmentation algorithms considered was very high with a negligible variability of <5% in comparison to that associated with manual delineation (5-35%).

conclusionThe use of advanced image segmentation algorithms may not only allow high accuracy as previously demonstrated, but also provide a robust and repeatable tool to aid physicians as an initial guess in determining functional volumes in PET.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.