Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21224356›Full record

ArticleCancer research2011

NCI Image-Guided Drug Delivery Summit.

Pushpa Tandon, Keyvan Farahani

Open access · bronzeAbstract readConference Proceedings
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Image-guided drug delivery in lung cancer.Drug delivery and translational research · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Advances in image-guided drug delivery.Drug delivery and translational research · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pushpa TandonCancer Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
Keyvan Farahani
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On April 17, 2010, scientists from academia, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) assembled at "The NCI Image Guided Drug Delivery Summit," in Washington D.C., to discuss recent advances, barriers, opportunities, and regulatory issues related to the field. The meeting included a scientific session and an NCI/FDA session, followed by a panel discussion of speakers from both sessions. Image-guided drug delivery (IGDD) in cancer is a form of individualized therapy where imaging methods are used in guidance and monitoring of localized and targeted delivery of therapeutics to the tumor. So, a systematic approach to IGDD requires mechanisms for targeting, delivery, activation, and monitoring of the process. Although the goal in IGDD is to optimize the therapeutic ratio through personalized image-guided treatments, a major challenge is in overcoming the biological barriers to the delivery of therapeutics into tumors and cells. Speakers discussed potential challenges to clinical translation of nano-based drug delivery systems including in vivo characterization of nanocarriers, preclinical validation of targeting and delivery, studies of biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and toxicity as well as scale-up manufacturing of delivery systems. Physiologic and quantitative imaging techniques may serve as enabling tools that could potentially transform many existing challenges into opportunities for advancement of the field.

Indexed as

AnimalsDiagnostic ImagingDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID21224356
PMCPMC3075539
OpenAlexW2109880290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.