ArticleBMC cancer2011
Support vector machine model for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer with multidetector computed tomography: a preliminary study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning and deep learning models for preoperative detection of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Pooled it
- Current status and trends of machine learning applied in clinical research of gastric cancer from 2004 to 2023: global bibliometric and visual analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of the Liver: A Systematic Review.Digestion · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning for lymph node metastasis prediction of in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Global updates in the treatment of gastric cancer: a systematic review. Part 2: perioperative management, multimodal therapies, new technologies, standardization of the surgical treatment and educational aspects.Updates in surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Metastatic Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Application of dual-layer spectral detector computed tomography to evaluate the expression of Ki-67 in colorectal cancer.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022Article
- Development of the PERI-Gastric (PEritoneal Recurrence Index) and PERI-Gram (Peritoneal Recurrence Index NomoGRAM) for predicting the risk of metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis after gastrectomy with curative intent for gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence performance in detecting tumor metastasis from medical radiology imaging: A systematic review and meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2021Article
- Computed Tomography Features of Gastric Cancer Patients With DNA Mismatch Repair Deficiency.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Computed tomography texture analysis in patients with gastric cancer: a quantitative imaging biomarker for preoperative evaluation before neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment.Japanese journal of radiology · 2020Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Multiclass Classification of Benign or Malignant Mucosal Lesions of the Stomach.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
- Genotype prediction of ATRX mutation in lower-grade gliomas using an MRI radiomics signature.European radiology · 2018Article
- T and N Staging of Gastric Cancer Using Dual-Source Computed Tomography.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2018Article
- Prediction of 5-year overall survival in cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy using computational intelligence methods.BMC cancer · 2017Article
- Whole-lesion apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis: significance in T and N staging of gastric cancers.BMC cancer · 2017Article
- Diagnostic classification of solitary pulmonary nodules using dual timeScientific reports · 2017Article
- Predicting distant failure in early stage NSCLC treated with SBRT using clinical parameters.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2016Article
- Runx3 expression in lymph nodes with metastasis is associated with the outcome of gastric cancer patients.Oncology letters · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLymph node metastasis (LNM) of gastric cancer is an important prognostic factor regarding long-term survival. But several imaging techniques which are commonly used in stomach cannot satisfactorily assess the gastric cancer lymph node status. They can not achieve both high sensitivity and specificity. As a kind of machine-learning methods, Support Vector Machine has the potential to solve this complex issue.
methodsThe institutional review board approved this retrospective study. 175 consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent MDCT before surgery were included. We evaluated the tumor and lymph node indicators on CT images including serosal invasion, tumor classification, tumor maximum diameter, number of lymph nodes, maximum lymph node size and lymph nodes station, which reflected the biological behavior of gastric cancer. Univariate analysis was used to analyze the relationship between the six image indicators with LNM. A SVM model was built with these indicators above as input index. The output index was that lymph node metastasis of the patient was positive or negative. It was confirmed by the surgery and histopathology. A standard machine-learning technique called k-fold cross-validation (5-fold in our study) was used to train and test SVM models. We evaluated the diagnostic capability of the SVM models in lymph node metastasis with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. And the radiologist classified the lymph node metastasis of patients by using maximum lymph node size on CT images as criterion. We compared the areas under ROC curves (AUC) of the radiologist and SVM models.
resultsIn 175 cases, the cases of lymph node metastasis were 134 and 41 cases were not. The six image indicators all had statistically significant differences between the LNM negative and positive groups. The means of the sensitivity, specificity and AUC of SVM models with 5-fold cross-validation were 88.5%, 78.5% and 0.876, respectively. While the diagnostic power of the radiologist classifying lymph node metastasis by maximum lymph node size were only 63.4%, 75.6% and 0.757. Each SVM model of the 5-fold cross-validation performed significantly better than the radiologist.
conclusionsBased on biological behavior information of gastric cancer on MDCT images, SVM model can help diagnose the lymph node metastasis preoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.