SynthesisJournal of neuro-oncology2011
Proteomic data in meningiomas: post-proteomic analysis can reveal novel pathophysiological pathways.
Synthesis in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- VDAC2: an emerging pivotal and multifaceted regulator in tumor biology.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Review
- Circulating Tumor Biomarkers in Meningiomas Reveal a Signature of Equilibrium Between Tumor Growth and Immune Modulation.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Article
- VDAC2-specific cellular functions and the underlying structure.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2016Review
- Quantitative proteomic analysis of meningiomas for the identification of surrogate protein markers.Scientific reports · 2014Article
- Interactions among mitochondrial proteins altered in glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2014Article
- Meningiomas and Proteomics: Focus on New Potential Biomarkers and Molecular Pathways.Cancer genomics & proteomicsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Meningiomas account for approximately 20% of adult primary intracranial tumours. WHO I meningiomas are the most common and are generally benign, but can progress, recur or transform to WHO II or WHO III grades over many years. A systematic review of multiple independent shotgun proteomic analyses of meningioma was performed to provide insight into underlying disease pathways. Shotgun proteomics has been conducted in seven meningioma related studies but there is considerable variation in aims, methodology, statistical power and the use of control tissue between these studies. Fifteen proteins which are different between WHO I and WHO II meningiomas and nine proteins which are different between WHO II and WHO III meningiomas have been described but without a view of their biological significance. Network analysis of proteins different between WHO I and WHO II meningiomas provided a coherent hypothesis for the involvement of these proteins in meningioma. Western blot analyses of meningioma tissue provided a measure of support for a core component in the network (involving VDAC2, APOA1 and HNF4α) but highlighted intrinsic difficulty of proteomic and biochemical analysis of meningiomas (as a consequence of gross alterations in tissue composition). Systematic review of shotgun proteomics and network analysis provides insight into meningioma pathophysiology despite the many barriers and difficulties that are inherent to this type of study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.