Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21221993›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2011

Pediatric oncology for the general pediatrician: introduction to the Educational series.

Koenraad K Norga

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Koenraad K Norga

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its establishment as a pediatric subspecialty oncology has become the near exclusive domain of specialized tertiary centers. This has greatly aided progress in the field with formation of exemplary and highly focused international consortia that have continued to streamline clinical research efforts. Recently, the rate of progress in terms of further improvements in overall outcome has paradoxically slowed. Novel strategies are therefore needed to assure continued advances. On the one hand, international and global consortia of subspecialists will continue to focus on the development of much needed improved therapies for those disease groups that have not yet seen their prognosis brighten, and on the other hand, there is a trend to invest in the development of joint-care initiatives that assure cost-effective access to standard therapy for all. This will require closer involvement of the general pediatrician in certain aspects of cancer care in its broadest sense. We hope the upcoming series will aid this process by highlighting selected topics in pediatric oncology that are likely to gain even more relevance for the general pediatrician in the years to come. They include: screening strategies for cancer predisposition syndromes; molecular diagnosis and risk-adjustment of therapy for acute leukemia in childhood; an overview of new agents in clinical development; and the impact of cancer treatment on fertility and available preservation options.

Indexed as

PhysiciansChildEducation, MedicalHumansMedical OncologyPediatrics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.