Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21221914›Full record

ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2010

[High intensity training (HIT) for the improvement of endurance capacity of recreationally active people and in prevention & rehabilitation].

Patrick Wahl, Matthias Hägele, Christoph Zinner, Wilhelm Bloch, Joachim Mester

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [High-intensity interval training for young athletes].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Patrick WahlInstitut für Trainingswissenschaft und Sportinformatik, Deutsche Sporthochschule Köln, Köln, Germany. Wahl@dshs-koeln.de
Matthias Hägele
Christoph Zinner
Wilhelm Bloch
Joachim Mester

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although intensive exercise protocols are commonly used in practical training and scientific studies, there is recently a great scientific discussion about "high intensity (interval) training" (HIT). New are the large amounts of studies and the more detailed knowledge about the physiological responses and adaptations to HIT in comparison to the classic high volume, low intensity endurance training. The present article summarizes the current knowledge about HIT in endurance exercise for clinical applications. In the first part, molecular and cellular adaptations to HIT are discussed in comparison to low intensity high volume training. Furthermore, studies are summarized which compare HIT vs. HVT in the field of prevention and rehabilitation. Terminally the differences in physiological stimuli of both training interventions are considered.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationCardiovascular DiseasesEnergy MetabolismExerciseHemodynamicsHumansMuscle, SkeletalOxygenPhysical Education and TrainingPhysical EndurancePotassiumOxygenPotassium

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.