Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21221681›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2012

Hydrogen peroxide release kinetics into saliva from different whitening products: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial.

Duarte Nuno da Silva Marques, António Duarte Sola Pereira da Mata, João Miguel Lourenço Silveira, Joana Rita Oliveira Faria Marques, João Pedro de Almeida Rato Amaral, Nuno Filipe Rito Parada Marques Guilherme

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05605834 (Assessment of Peroxide Level in Saliva During Teeth Bleaching With 9.5% Hydrogen Peroxide Gel Using a Tray With Reservoir Versus a Tray Without Reservoir. A Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05605834 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Assessment of Peroxide Level in Saliva During Teeth Bleaching With 9.5% Hydrogen Peroxide Gel Using a Tray With Reservoir Versus a Tray Without Reservoir. A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled34ConditionsConsumption, ToxicityArms9.5% hydrogen peroxide bleaching (POLA DAY advanced tooth whitening system, SDI) using a tray with reservoir, 9.5% hydrogen peroxide bleaching (POLA DAY advanced tooth whitening system, SDI) using a tray without reservoir.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Home-based chemically-induced whitening (bleaching) of teeth in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Duarte Nuno da Silva MarquesOral Biology and Biochemistry Group, Biomedical and Oral Sciences Research Unit (FCT Unit 4062), University of Lisbon School of Dental Medicine, Campus Universitário, 1649-003, Lisbon, Portugal. duartemd@yahoo.co.uk
António Duarte Sola Pereira da Mata
João Miguel Lourenço Silveira
Joana Rita Oliveira Faria Marques
João Pedro de Almeida Rato Amaral
Nuno Filipe Rito Parada Marques Guilherme
University of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare salivary hydrogen peroxide (HP) release kinetics and potential toxicity of systemic exposure of four different whitening products. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted in a Portuguese dental faculty clinic. Two hundred forty volunteers were randomized to eight intervention groups. Participants were randomly assigned to receive active or placebo applications of one of four different products: Opalescence 10% PF™ (OPL), Vivastyle® 10%™ (VS10%), Vivadent Paint On Plus™ (PO+), and Trés White Supreme™ (TWS). Saliva collection was obtained by established methods at different times. The HP salivary content was determined by a photometric method. Salivary HP variations, total amount of salivary HP, and counts of subjects above the safe daily HP dose were the main outcome measures. All whitening systems significantly released HP to the saliva when compared to placebo, and all showed different release kinetics. The adaptable tray system (TWS) presented a risk increase of 37% [20-54%, 95% confidence interval] when compared to the other systems. The use of an adaptable tray whitening system with higher concentration of HP increases the toxicity potential.

Indexed as

Carbamide PeroxideDouble-Blind MethodDrug CombinationsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydrogen PeroxideMalePeroxidesPhotometryPlacebosPolyvinylsSafetySalivaTime FactorsTooth BleachingCarbamide PeroxideDrug CombinationsHydrogen PeroxidePeroxidesPlacebosPolyvinylstooth-bleaching agent, OpalescenceTooth Bleaching AgentsUreaVivastyle

Identifiers

PMID21221681
OpenAlexW2068432541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.