Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21221607›Full record

SynthesisClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2011

Long-term outcome after sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: a patient-level meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Antoinette de Waha, Alban Dibra, Sebastian Kufner, Dietrich Baumgart, Manel Sabate, Aleardo Maresta, Albert Schömig, Adnan Kastrati

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Everolimus-eluting versus sirolimus-eluting stents: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Use of drug-eluting stents in acute myocardial infarction with persistent ST-segment elevation: results of the ALKK PCI-registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Antoinette de WahaDeutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Lazarettstr. 36, 80636, Munich, Germany.
Alban Dibra
Sebastian Kufner
Dietrich Baumgart
Manel Sabate
Aleardo Maresta
Albert Schömig
Adnan Kastrati
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DEHospital de Sant Pau · ESKliniken Essen-Mitte · DEOspedale "Santa Maria delle Croci" di Ravenna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough it is widely believed that patients with diabetes mellitus obtain the greatest benefit from drug-eluting stents, convincing evidence on long-term efficacy and safety of these stents is lacking.

methodsWe performed a meta-analysis of individual patient data from four randomized trials including 583 patients comparing sirolimus eluting with bare metal stents (median follow-up of 4.2 years). These were the only specific trials reporting on drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major cardiac events. The secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction as a safety endpoint and target lesion re-intervention as an efficacy endpoint. Stent thrombosis was also evaluated.

resultsThere was a significant reduction in the overall hazard of major cardiac events (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36-0.63, P < 0.001) with sirolimus-eluting stents. This was mostly due to a significant reduction in the overall hazard of repeat revascularization (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18-0.41, P < 0.001) in favor of sirolimus-eluting stents. However, the overall hazard of death (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.59-1.41, P = 0.68) as well as death or myocardial infarction (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.54-1.09, P = 0.14) were not significantly different between the groups. No significant differences were observed regarding stent thrombosis (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.15-1.69, P = 0.26).

conclusionsSirolimus-eluting stents are highly effective in reducing the risk for major cardiac events and safe in diabetic patients with coronary artery disease.

Indexed as

Diabetes ComplicationsSirolimusAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseDrug-Eluting StentsFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStentsTreatment OutcomeSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID21221607
OpenAlexW1964054656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.