ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011
In vitro intracellular activity and in vivo efficacy of modithromycin, a novel bicyclolide, against Legionella pneumophila.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monotherapy versus combination therapy in severe Legionella pneumonia: a multicenter retrospective observational study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- A Pilot Study forSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- In vitro antibacterial activity of modithromycin, a novel 6,11-bridged bicyclolide, against respiratory pathogens, including macrolide-resistant Gram-positive cocci.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The in vitro and in vivo activities of modithromycin, a novel bicyclolide, against Legionella pneumophila were compared with those of telithromycin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, and levofloxacin. All the test agents decreased the intracellular growth of viable L. pneumophila bacteria over 96 h of incubation in both types of cells used, A/J mouse-derived macrophages and A549 human alveolar epithelial cells, at extracellular concentrations of 4× and 16× MIC, respectively. However, when the agents were removed from the medium after exposure for 2 h, regrowth of intracellular bacteria occurred in both cell systems when they were exposed to telithromycin, clarithromycin, and levofloxacin but not when they were exposed to modithromycin and azithromycin. Once-daily administration of modithromycin at a dose of 10 mg/kg of body weight for 5 days led to a significant decrease of intrapulmonary viable L. pneumophila bacteria in immunosuppressed A/J mice. The efficacy of modithromycin was superior to the efficacies of telithromycin and clarithromycin and comparable to the efficacies of azithromycin and levofloxacin. In addition, modithromycin and azithromycin inhibited the intrapulmonary regrowth of bacteria even at 72 h after the last treatment, but telithromycin and levofloxacin did not. These results suggested that modithromycin has longer-lasting cellular pharmacokinetic features like azithromycin. In conclusion, modithromycin, as well as azithromycin, has excellent in vitro and in vivo bactericidal activities and persistent efficacy against intracellular L. pneumophila. Modithromycin should be a useful agent for treatment of pulmonary infections caused by this pathogen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.