ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011
Imaging electrical resonance in hair cells.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling of Frequency Dependence of Selectivity and Sensitivity of Mammalian Otolith Membranes during Electrical Stimulation of the Vestibular Nerves.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Supertemporal Resolution Imaging of Membrane Potential via Stroboscopic Microscopy.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2023Article
- Current Practice in Using Voltage Imaging to Record Fast Neuronal Activity: Successful Examples from Invertebrate to Mammalian Studies.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Development of Bionic Semicircular Canals and the Sensation of Angular Acceleration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Inner hair cell stereocilia are embedded in the tectorial membrane.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Sensory Hair Cells: An Introduction to Structure and Physiology.Integrative and comparative biology · 2018Review
- Physiological Preparation of Hair Cells from the Sacculus of the American Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana).Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017Article
- Stochastic amplification of calcium-activated potassium currents in Ca2+ microdomains.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanosensory hair cells of many auditory receptor organs are tuned by an electrical resonance that increases their responses to stimulation over a narrow band of frequencies. The small oscillations of membrane potential characteristic of this phenomenon have previously been detectable only through intracellular electrode measurements, which are laborious and preclude analysis at the level of an entire sensory organ. We used a voltage-sensitive dye to image hair-cell electrical resonance in an intact preparation of the bullfrog's sacculus, a receptor organ sensitive to low-frequency seismic and auditory stimuli. Imaging revealed distinct populations of hair cells whose resonant response varied with the frequency of transepithelial electrical stimulation. Most of the hair cells in the saccular epithelium in vitro were electrically tuned to stimulation at 25-50 Hz. The frequency dependence of the fluorescence signal was sensitive to pharmacological blockade of large-conductance Ca(2+)-sensitive K(+) channels and to enzymatic digestion. At an elevated concentration of Ca(2+), we observed transient fluorescence signals that probably represented action potentials. The stroboscopic imaging and analysis techniques described here present a general approach for studying subthreshold oscillations in electrically excitable cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.