Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21219502›Full record

SynthesisDrug and alcohol review2011

Areas of disadvantage: a systematic review of effects of area-level socioeconomic status on substance use outcomes.

Katherine J Karriker-Jaffe

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drug and alcohol review, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 142 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
142citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

142 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Life Course Assessment of Area-Based Social Disadvantage: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

82 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Katherine J Karriker-JaffeAlcohol Research Group, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA. kkarrikerjaffe@arg.org

Funding

GRADUATE RESEARCH TRAINING ON ALCOHOL PROBLEMST32AA007240 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI William C. Kerr · 1985 to 2026
$7.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007240NIAAA NIH HHS T32AA00724028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issuesThis review examines whether area-level disadvantage is associated with increased substance use and whether study results are impacted by the size of the area examined, definition of socioeconomic status (SES), age or ethnicity of participants, outcome variables or analytic techniques. APPROACH: Five electronic databases and the reference sections of identified papers were searched to locate studies of the effects of area-level SES on substance use published through the end of 2007 in English-language, peer-reviewed journals or books. The 41 studies that met inclusion criteria included 238 effects, with a subsample of 34 studies (180 effects) used for the main analyses. Study findings were stratified by methodological characteristics and synthesised using generalised estimating equations to account for clustering of effects within studies. KEY

findingsThere was strong evidence that substance use outcomes cluster by geographic area, but there was limited and conflicting support for the hypothesis that area-level disadvantage is associated with increased substance use. Support for the disadvantage hypothesis appeared to vary by sample age and ethnicity, size of area examined, type of SES measure, specific outcome considered and analysis techniques. IMPLICATIONS: Future studies should use rigorous methods to yield more definitive conclusions about the effects of area-level SES on alcohol and drug outcomes, including composite measures of SES and both bivariate and multivariate analyses.

conclusionFurther research is needed to identify confounds of the relationship between area-level SES and substance use and to explain why the effects of area-level SES vary by outcome and residents' age.

Indexed as

Social ClassAdolescentAdultDatabases, FactualEthnicityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedResidence CharacteristicsSocial EnvironmentSocioeconomic FactorsSubstance-Related DisordersTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21219502
PMCPMC3057656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.