Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21219196›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of clinical psychology2011

Gene-environment interaction in psychological traits and disorders.

Danielle M Dick

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of clinical psychology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 127 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
127citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

127 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Systematic Review of Polygenic Risk Scores for Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Association ofBioscience reports · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. MSH3 rs26279 polymorphism increases cancer risk: a meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

67 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Danielle M DickDepartment of Psychiatry, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0126, USA. ddick@vcu.edu

Funding

The development of alcohol misuse and related problems from adolescence to early midlifeR01AA015416 · NIAAA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DICK, DANIELLE M, SALVATORE, JESSICA E · 2005 to 2024
$7.6M
Twin, molecular, and developmental approaches to understanding alcohol misuseK02AA018755 · NIAAA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI DICK, DANIELLE M · 2010 to 2019
$1.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA15416NIAAA NIH HHS K02 AA018755NIAAA NIH HHS K02AA018755NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been an explosion of interest in studying gene-environment interactions (GxE) as they relate to the development of psychopathology. In this article, I review different methodologies to study gene-environment interaction, providing an overview of methods from animal and human studies and illustrations of gene-environment interactions detected using these various methodologies. Gene-environment interaction studies that examine genetic influences as modeled latently (e.g., from family, twin, and adoption studies) are covered, as well as studies of measured genotypes. Importantly, the explosion of interest in gene-environment interactions has raised a number of challenges, including difficulties with differentiating various types of interactions, power, and the scaling of environmental measures, which have profound implications for detecting gene-environment interactions. Taking research on gene-environment interactions to the next level will necessitate close collaborations between psychologists and geneticists so that each field can take advantage of the knowledge base of the other.

Indexed as

AdoptionAnimalsEpigenesis, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetics, BehavioralGenotypeHumansMental DisordersSocial EnvironmentTwin Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID21219196
PMCPMC3647367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.