Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21218460›Full record

Trial reportCancer2010

A front-line window of opportunity phase 2 study of sorafenib in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study N0326.

Grace K Dy, Shauna L Hillman, Kendrith M Rowland, Julian R Molina, Preston D Steen, Donald B Wender, Suresh Nair, Sumithra Mandrekar, Steven E Schild, Alex A Adjei and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Grace K DyDepartment of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA.
Shauna L Hillman
Kendrith M Rowland
Julian R Molina
Preston D Steen
Donald B Wender
Suresh Nair
Sumithra Mandrekar
Steven E Schild
Alex A Adjei
North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study N0326
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USHematology Oncology Associates · USLehigh Valley Hospital · USMayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHU10CA025224 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI BUCKNER, JAN C · 1985 to 2013
$85.0M
SUPPLEMENTU10CA037404 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LOPRINZI, CHARLES L · 1985 to 2014
$34.8M
MICHIGAN CANCER RESEARCH CONSORTIUM CCOPU10CA063848 · NCI · SAINT JOSEPH MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM · PI STELLA, PHILIP J · 1994 to 2014
$17.2M
Sanford Community Cancer Program of the North Central Plains (NCORP)UG1CA189825 · NCI · SANFORD RESEARCH/USD · PI Daniel Almquist, SAMUEL J. MILANOVICH · 2014 to 2026
$13.6M
SIOUX COMMUNITY CANCER CONSORTIUMU10CA035103 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA · PI MAZURCZAK, MIROSLAW · 1985 to 2014
$11.6M
COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035195 · NCI · CARLE FOUNDATION HOSPITAL (URBANA, IL) · PI ROWLAND, KENDRITH MARTIN · 1985 to 2014
$11.3M
Illinois Oncology Research Association Community Clinical Oncology ProgramU10CA035113 · NCI · ONCOLOGY-HEMATOLOGY ASSOC-CENTRAL ILL · PI LE-LINDQWISTER, NGUYET A. · 1985 to 2014
$10.8M
IOWA ONCOLOGY RESEARCH ASSOCIATION CCOPU10CA035101 · NCI · IOWA ONCOLOGY RESEARCH ASSOCIATION · PI BEHRENS, ROBERT J. · 1985 to 2014
$10.1M
TOLEDO COMMUNITY CLINICAL ONCOLOGY PROGRAMU10CA035415 · NCI · TOLEDO COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ONCOLOGY PROG · PI MOWAT, REX BRADLEY · 1985 to 2014
$9.9M
ST LUKE'S HOSPITALS CCOPU10CA037417 · NCI · ST. LUKE'S HOSPITALS-MERITCARE · PI STEEN, PRESTON D · 1985 to 2014
$7.3M
CEDARS RAPIDS ONCOLOGY PROJECTU10CA052352 · NCI · CEDAR RAPIDS ONCOLOGY PROJECT · PI WILBUR, DEBORAH WEIL · 1990 to 2012
$4.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA-25,224NCI NIH HHS CA-35,101NCI NIH HHS CA-35,103NCI NIH HHS CA-35,113NCI NIH HHS CA-35,195NCI NIH HHS CA-35,415NCI NIH HHS CA-37,404NCI NIH HHS CA-37,417NCI NIH HHS CA-52,352NCI NIH HHS CA-63,848NCI NIH HHS U10 CA025224NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035101NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035103NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035113NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035195NCI NIH HHS U10 CA035415NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037404NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037417NCI NIH HHS U10 CA052352NCI NIH HHS U10 CA063848NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189825
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current study was conducted to assess the efficacy and toxicity of sorafenib as front-line therapy in patients with stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or IV nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

methodsPatients received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily by mouth continuously, and were evaluated every 2 weeks during the first 8 weeks. Patients who manifested clinical progression during this period proceeded to receive standard of care. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective tumor response. A 2-stage Fleming design was used such that if at most 1 confirmed partial response (PR) or complete response was observed in the first 20 patients (stage 1), the treatment would be considered ineffective, and further enrollment would be discontinued.

resultsOnly 1 PR was observed in the first 20 patients. By the time of study closure, 5 additional patients who were already being screened for study inclusion were enrolled. Of the 25 patients (15 women, 10 men; 4 stage IIIB, 21 stage IV; median age, 67 years [range, 45-85 years]), there were 3 (12%) PRs and 6 (24%) cases with stable disease observed. The median time-to-progression and progression-free survival was 2.8 months. Seven (28%) patients remained progression-free at 24 weeks. No grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events were observed. Thirteen (52%) patients had a grade 3 nonhematologic adverse event, with fatigue (20%), diarrhea (8%), and dyspnea (8%) being the most common.

conclusionsSorafenib is not effective as front-line therapy in the general unselected NSCLC population. The window of opportunity design is feasible for estimating the activity of novel compounds.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBenzenesulfonatesCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPrognosisPyridinesSorafenibAntineoplastic AgentsBenzenesulfonatesNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPyridinesSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID21218460
PMCPMC5725955
OpenAlexW1523284208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.