Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21217396›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of clinical oncology2011

Dual blockade of the EGFR and COX-2 pathways: a phase II trial of cetuximab and celecoxib in patients with chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Emily Chan, Bonnie Lafleur, Mace L Rothenberg, Nipun Merchant, Albert Craig Lockhart, Bakula Trivedi, Christine H Chung, Robert J Coffey, Jordan D Berlin

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of clinical oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Emily ChanVanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, Nashville, TN, USA. emily.chan@vanderbilt.edu
Bonnie Lafleur
Mace L Rothenberg
Nipun Merchant
Albert Craig Lockhart
Bakula Trivedi
Christine H Chung
Robert J Coffey
Jordan D Berlin
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBPfizer (United States) · USUniversity of Arizona · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Understanding and Controlling p120 Dysfunction in CRCP50CA095103 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI COFFEY, ROBERT J. · 2002 to 2017
$33.6M
TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTORS IN COLONIC NEOPLASIAR01CA046413 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI COFFEY, ROBERT J. · 1988 to 2016
$8.8M
Molecular signatures of HNSCC in response to targeted therapiesR01DE017982 · NIDCR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CHUNG, CHRISTINE H · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA46413NCI NIH HHS P50 CA095103NCI NIH HHS P50CA095103NCI NIH HHS R01 CA046413NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE017982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) pathways play key and often complementary roles in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). This study explores the clinical and biological effects of combined blockade of these pathways.

methodsCetuximab-naive patients with refractory CRC were treated with cetuximab (400 mg/m loading dose followed by weekly cetuximab at 250 mg/m) and celecoxib (200 mg orally twice daily). Urinary PGE-M, a stable metabolite of PGE2 that correlates with in vivo COX-2 activity, and serum TGF-α, a ligand that binds to EGFR, were measured serially to assess the biological effect of COX-2 and EGFR blockade.

resultsSeventeen patients accrued in this study. Of the 13 patients evaluable for response, 2 (15.4%) had confirmed partial responses, 4 (30.8%) had stable disease, and 7 (53.8%) had progressive disease. The median progression-free survival for all evaluable patients was 55 days (95% confidence interval, 45-112; range, 10-295 d). This study was terminated early owing to lack of sufficient clinical activity. There were no statistically significant differences in serum TGF-α or urinary PGE-M between cycles in responders or nonresponders.

conclusionsThis regimen resulted in response rates similar to those published for cetuximab monotherapy in patients with recurrent CRC. Apart from a higher than expected rate of infusion reactions, no other unexpected toxicities were observed. No differences in serum TGF-α or urinary PGE-M between cycles were seen, suggesting that the appropriate targets may not have been hit.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCelecoxibCetuximabColorectal NeoplasmsCyclooxygenase 2Disease-Free SurvivalErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansMaleMiceMice, NudeNeoplasm MetastasisAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCelecoxibCetuximabCyclooxygenase 2EGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsPyrazolesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID21217396
PMCPMC3133812
OpenAlexW1994335425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.