Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21216937›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2011

Chromatin structure predicts epigenetic therapy responsiveness in sarcoma.

Joslyn Mills, Todd Hricik, Sara Siddiqi, Igor Matushansky

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joslyn MillsDepartment of Pathology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Todd Hricik
Sara Siddiqi
Igor Matushansky
Columbia University · US

Funding

The role of DKK1, a Wnt-Inhibitor, in Mesenchymal Differentiation/SarcomagenesisK08CA132986 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MATUSHANSKY, IGOR · 2009 to 2012
$680k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA132986
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To formally explore the potential therapeutic effect of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACI) and DNA-methyltransferase inhibitors (DNA-MI) on sarcomas, we treated a large sarcoma cell line panel with five different HDACIs in the absence and presence of the DNA-MI decitabine. We observed that the IC(50) value of each HDACI was consistent for all cell lines whereas decitabine as a single agent showed no growth inhibition at standard doses. Combination HDACI/DNA-MI therapy showed a preferential synergism for specific sarcoma cell lines. Subsequently, we identified and validated (in vitro and in vivo) a two-gene set signature (high CUGBP2; low RHOJ) that associated with the synergistic phenotype. We further uncover that the epigenetic synergism leading to specific upregulation of CDKI p21 in specific cell lines is a function of the differences in the degree of baseline chromatin modification. Finally, we show that these chromatin and gene expression patterns are similarly present in the majority of high-grade primary sarcomas. Our results provide the first demonstration of a gene set that can predict responsiveness to HDACI/DNA-MI and links this responsiveness mechanistically to the baseline chromatin structure.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalChromatinCluster AnalysisDrug SynergismEnzyme InhibitorsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHumansMiceMice, SCIDRandom AllocationSarcomaChromatinEnzyme InhibitorsHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID21216937
PMCPMC3075587
OpenAlexW2116095216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.