Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21216911›Full record

ReviewApplied and environmental microbiology2011

The multifactorial basis for plant health promotion by plant-associated bacteria.

Young Cheol Kim, Johan Leveau, Brian B McSpadden Gardener, Elizabeth A Pierson, Leland S Pierson, Choong-Min Ryu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Effects of Co-InoculatingPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  20. Seeds ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Young Cheol KimDepartment of Plant Pathology-OARDC, 1680 Madison Avenue, Wooster, OH 44691, USA.
Johan Leveau
Brian B McSpadden Gardener
Elizabeth A Pierson
Leland S Pierson
Choong-Min Ryu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

On plants, microbial populations interact with each other and their host through the actions of secreted metabolites. However, the combined action of diverse organisms and their different metabolites on plant health has yet to be fully appreciated. Here, the multifactorial nature of these interactions, at the organismal and molecular level, leading to the biological control of plant diseases is reviewed. To do so, we describe in detail the ecological significance of three different classes of secondary metabolites and discuss how they might contribute to biological control. Specifically, the roles of auxin, acetoin, and phenazines are considered, because they represent very different but important types of secondary metabolites. We also describe how studies of the global regulation of bacterial secondary metabolism have led to the discovery of new genes and phenotypes related to plant health promotion. In conclusion, we describe three avenues for future research that will help to integrate these complex and diverse observations into a more coherent synthesis of bacterially mediated biocontrol of plant diseases.

Indexed as

Bacterial Physiological PhenomenaSymbiosisAcetoinBacteriaIndoleacetic AcidsPhenazinesPlantsAcetoinIndoleacetic AcidsPhenazines

Identifiers

PMID21216911
PMCPMC3067257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.